Almost.

I'm pointing out its efficacy.

All morality is self-denial.

Basically, I have the highest respect for those who live for peace and passively accept the world as it hits them. After them I have respect for those who live for power, who seek to impose their agency on the world. They're beneath me, but I acknowledge that they live according to their philosophy.

The lowest are those who believe themselves to have no power. The "I can't change anything" "what good would it do" types.

I don't "love" violence. But I acknowledge freely that it works, and frequently works quite well.

If my position seems strange it's because I'm not a consequentialist. Most culture warriors (both SJWs and Pedes) ARE consequentialists. And it's in consequentialism that the whole "if I do this, I'll get killed/convicted and that would be bad" question becomes pertinent.

If every religious figure in history from Abraham to Jesus to Joan of Arc had been consequentialists then there wouldn't be religion at all (well, aside from marxism, the OG consequentialist faith).

Almost.

I'm pointing out its efficacy.

All morality is self-denial.

Basically, I have the highest respect for those who live for peace and passively accept the world as it hits them. After them I have respect for those who live for power, who seek to impose their agency on the world. They're beneath me, but I acknowledge that they live according to their philosophy.

The lowest are those who believe themselves to have no power. The "I can't change anything" "what good would it do" types.

I don't "love" violence. But I acknowledge freely that it works, and frequently works quite well.

If my position seems strange it's because I'm not a consequentialist. Most culture warriors (both SJWs and Pedes) ARE consequentialists. And it's in consequentialism that the whole "if I do this, I'll get killed/convicted and that would be bad" question becomes pertinent.

If every religious figure in history from Abraham to Jesus to Joan of Arc had been consequentialists then there wouldn't be religion at all (well, aside from marxism, the OG consequentialist faith) and certainly no martyrs.

Almost.

I'm pointing out its efficacy.

All morality is self-denial.

Basically, I have the highest respect for those who live for peace and passively accept the world as it hits them. After them I have respect for those who live for power, who seek to impose their agency on the world. They're beneath me, but I acknowledge that they live according to their philosophy.

The lowest are those who believe themselves to have no power. The "I can't change anything" "what good would it do" types.

I don't "love" violence. But I acknowledge freely that it works, and frequently works quite well.

If my position seems strange it's because I'm not a consequentialist. Most culture warriors (both SJWs and Pedes) ARE consequentialists. And it's in consequentialism that the whole "if I do this, I'll get killed/convicted and that would be bad" question becomes pertinent.

If every religious figure in history from Abraham to Jesus to Joan of Arc had been consequentialists then there wouldn't be religion at all and certainly no martyrs.

Almost.

I'm pointing out its efficacy.

All morality is self-denial.

Basically, I have the highest respect for those who live for peace and passively accept the world as it hits them. After them I have respect for those who live for power, who seek to impose their agency on the world. They're beneath me, but I acknowledge that they live according to their philosophy.

The lowest are those who believe themselves to have no power. The "I can't change anything" "what good would it do" types.

I don't "love" violence. But I acknowledge freely that it works, and frequently works quite well.

If my position seems strange it's because I'm not a consequentialist. Most culture warriors (both SJWs and Pedes) ARE consequentialists. And it's in consequentialism that the whole "if I do this, I'll get killed/convicted and that would be bad" question becomes pertinent.

If every religious figure in history from Issac to Jesus to Joan of Arc had been consequentialists then there wouldn't be religion at all and certainly no martyrs.

Almost.

I'm pointing out its efficacy.

All morality is self-denial.

Basically, I have the highest respect for those who live for peace and passively accept the world as it hits them. After them I have respect for those who live for power, who seek to impose their agency on the world. They're beneath me, but I acknowledge that they live according to their philosophy.

The lowest are those who believe themselves to have no power. The "I can't change anything" "what good would it do" types.

I don't "love" violence. But I acknowledge freely that it works, and frequently works quite well.

If my position seems strange it's because I'm not a consequentialist. Most culture warriors (both SJWs and Pedes) ARE consequentialists. And it's in consequentialism that the whole "if I do this, I'll get killed/convicted and that would be bad" question becomes pertinent.

Almost.

I'm pointing out its efficacy.

All morality is self-denial.

Basically, I have the highest respect for those who live for peace and passively accept the world as it hits them. After them I have respect for those who live for power, who seek to impose their agency on the world. They're beneath me, but I acknowledge that they live according to their philosophy.

The lowest are those who believe themselves to have no power. The "I can't change anything" "what good would it do" types.

I don't "love" violence. But I acknowledge freely that it works, and frequently works quite well.

If my position seems strange it's because I'm not a consequentialist. Most culture warriors (both SJWs and Pedes) ARE consequentialists. And it's in consequentialism that the whole "if I do this, I'll get killed and that would be bad" question becomes pertinent.

Almost.

I'm pointing out its efficacy.

All morality is self-denial.

Basically, I have the highest respect for those who live for peace and passively accept the world as it hits them. After them I have respect for those who live for power, who seek to impose their agency on the world. They're beneath me, but I acknowledge that they live according to their philosophy.

The lowest are those who believe themselves to have no power. The "I can't change anything" "what good would it do" types.

I don't "love" violence. But I acknowledge freely that it works, and frequently works quite well.

If my position seems strange it's because I'm not a consequentialist. Most culture warriors (both SJWs and Pedes) ARE consequentialists.

Almost.

I'm pointing out its efficacy.

All morality is self-denial.

Basically, I have the highest respect for those who live for peace and passively accept the world as it hits them. After them I have respect for those who live for power, who seek to impose their agency on the world. They're beneath me, but I acknowledge that they live according to their philosophy.

The lowest are those who believe themselves to have no power. The "I can't change anything" "what good would it do" types.

I don't "love" violence. But I acknowledge freely that it works, and frequently works quite well.

If my position seems strange it's because I'm not a consequentialist. Most culture warriors (both SJWs and Pedes) ARE consequentialists.

Almost.

I'm pointing out its efficacy.

All morality is self-denial.

Basically, I have the highest respect for those who live for peace and passively accept the world as it hits them. After them I have respect for those who live for power, who seek to impose their agency on the world. They're beneath me, but I acknowledge that they live according to their philosophy.

The lowest are those who believe themselves to have no power. The "I can't change anything" "what good would it do" types.

I don't "love" violence. But I acknowledge freely that it works, and frequently works quite well.

Almost.

I'm pointing out its efficacy.

All morality is self-denial.

Basically, I have the highest respect for those who live for peace and passively accept the world as it hits them. After them I have respect for those who live for power, who seek to impose their agency on the world. They're beneath me, but I acknowledge that they live according to their philosophy.

The lowest are those who believe themselves to have no power. The "I can't change anything" "what good would it do" types.