Thank you. Yes, much of what I've been speaking about is there.
Here is some of what I responded with to someone else as well. So don't think this is "directed at you," it's just more information that may be of use to you in the future. Not even sure if this will help you at all anyway, since you seem pretty well informed yourself:
Originally, when creating the vaxx, the developers chose the spike protein because they believed it to be a good antigen. As development continued, so did our understanding of the virus itself. Numerous studies has shown that the most severe effects of Covid, such as blood clotting and bleeding, are due to the effects of the spike protein of the virus itself. It wasn't until later they discovered that the spike protein itself was a pathogenic protein -- it's a toxin. So vaccinations may very well be be injecting said toxin into people.
It's important to remember that the speculations of the dangers surrounding the spike protein are only offering a plausible explanation to what we already know. That's many people are currently being effecting by severe reactions to the vaccine. Currently, the entire "counter-claim" comes from duplicitous people who appear to be towing the line, and they refute the claims not by saying they're false, but rather, by simply saying: "The studies never said they were harmful!" or "it's an assumption that if the viral spike protein can cause damage, then the spike protein generated in vaccinated people does the same." Yeah, no shit. That's why it's being noted as a plausible explanation, because what we are undeniably seeing is the vaccine being associated with increased blot clots, strokes, and heart inflammation. These people seem more concerned with pushing their agenda than actually doing real science to discover if it's a possibility. Furthermore, the same people refuting it are also the ones who are screaming masks and lockdowns are effective, They also disingenuously treat Covid like it's the damn black plague and ignore how inflated the death numbers are due to the CDC changes, and more-or-less attempt to silence literally anyone who doesn't conform with the the narrative. Saying that something is supposed to work in a certain way is not the same as it actually doing just that. The claim that "the clinical relevance of this finding is unknown and should be further explored" is ridiculous as well. How many people will have to by maim/injured/killed in the meantime? How can these same people be advocating for vaccine mandates while simultaneously spewing nonsense like that?
To put it another way, they want people to participate based on "good faith." But can anyone tell me what they've done to earn the trust of people for the people to have faith in them?
If anything, their actions have not only been antithetical to science -- which is founding on being able to ask any questions you want and to have healthy debates about critical issues -- but they've also been taking a very authoritarian approach to all of this since day one, while completely ignoring any science that came before, and anything they don't want to believe now.
To further illustrate my point, in my first post, I elucidated that there have been 1,517,211 maimed/injured and 9,027 deaths following the vaccines recorded in the U.S. Government’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), right?
To any sane person, that should be a huge red flag. Period.
But, it's actually not the worst of it, because that same VAERS report is also being wildly under-reported. According to a study done back in 2010, before Covid, by Harvard (commissioned by our own government), less than 1% of all adverse reactions to vaccines are actually submitted to VAERS.
To date, the issues with the VAERS report still have not been fixed either. Let that sink in. So if those numbers above are only representative of <1%, what the hell would the actual statistics look like?
As a fun side-note, the VAERS report also doesn't include the thousands of people being effected by Bell's Palsy. But you don't hear about any of this on the news either, huh? Social media and big tech almost damn sure that anyone bringing such questions up immediately gets silenced and then the boot as well.
Here's some further reading on the VAERS system, if you're interested: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/vaccine-injury-reporting-systems-utterly-inadequate/
Thank you. Yes, much of what I've been speaking about is there.
Here is some of what I responded with to someone else as well. So don't think this is "directed at you," it's just more information that may be of use to you in the future. Not even sure if this will help you at all anyway, since you seem pretty well informed yourself:
Originally, when creating the vaxx, the developers chose the spike protein because they believed it to be a good antigen. As development continued, so did our understanding of the virus itself. Numerous studies has shown that the most severe effects of Covid, such as blood clotting and bleeding, are due to the effects of the spike protein of the virus itself. It wasn't until later they discovered that the spike protein itself was a pathogenic protein -- it's a toxin. So vaccinations may very well be be injecting said toxin into people.
It's important to remember that the speculations of the dangers surrounding the spike protein are only offering a plausible explanation to what we already know. That's many people are currently being effecting by severe reactions to the vaccine. Currently, the entire "counter-claim" comes from duplicitous people who appear to be towing the line, and they refute the claims not by saying they're false, but rather, by simply saying: "The studies never said they were harmful!" or "it's an assumption that if the viral spike protein can cause damage, then the spike protein generated in vaccinated people does the same." Yeah, no shit. That's why it's being noted as a plausible explanation, because what we are undeniably seeing is the vaccine being associated with increased blot clots, strokes, and heart inflammation. These people seem more concerned with pushing their agenda than actually doing real science to discover if it's a possibility. Furthermore, the same people refuting it are also the ones who are screaming masks and lockdowns are effective, They also disingenuously treat Covid like it's the damn black plague and ignore how inflated the death numbers are due to the CDC changes, and more-or-less attempt to silence literally anyone who doesn't conform with the the narrative. Saying that something is supposed to work in a certain way is not the same as it actually doing just that. The claim that "the clinical relevance of this finding is unknown and should be further explored" is ridiculous as well. How many people will have to by maim/injured/killed in the meantime? How can these same people be advocating for vaccine mandates while simultaneously spewing nonsense like that?
To put it another way, they want people to participate based on "good faith." But can anyone tell me what they've done to earn the trust of people for the people to have faith in them?
If anything, their actions have not only been antithetical to science -- which is founding on being able to ask any questions you want and to have healthy debates about critical issues -- but they've also been taking a very authoritarian approach to all of this since day one, while completely ignoring any science that came before, and anything they don't want to believe now.
To further illustrate my point, in my first post, I elucidated that there have been 1,517,211 maimed/injured and 9,027 deaths following the vaccines recorded in the U.S. Government’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), right?
To any sane person, that should be a huge red flag. Period.
But, it's actually not the worst of it, because that same VAERS report is also being wildly under-reported. According to a study done back in 2010, before Covid, by Harvard (commissioned by our own government), less than 1% of all adverse reactions to vaccines are actually submitted to VAERS.
To date, the issues with the VAERS report still have not been fixed either. Let that sink in. So if those numbers above are only representative of <1%, what the hell would the actual statistics look like?
As a fun side-note, the VAERS report also doesn't include the thousands of people being effected by Bell's Palsy. But you don't hear about any of this on the news either, huh? Social media and big tech almost damn sure that anyone bringing such questions up immediately gets silenced and then the boot as well.
Here's some further reading on the VAERS system, if you're interested: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/vaccine-injury-reporting-systems-utterly-inadequate/ https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/covid-vaccine-injuries-vaers-cdc/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=9af36675-e8d3-4040-a6be-abcb46990996