Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: add some words

They'll just remove Section 230 and replace it with a law that protects very specific categories of websites - those owned by big tech that are willing to censor what the government wants censored. Then glowies flood any other communication platforms with illegal content, and they commence with the lawsuits and takedowns.
The CP and "calls to violence" get so out of hand that Congress passes new Internet regulation that puts the burden on service providers to police content, and allows the DOJ to seize all domain name that are subjects of an investigation. (they already do this for "piracy" which is just another form of speech)

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: add some words

They'll just remove Section 230 and replace it with a law that protects very specific categories of websites - those owned by big tech that are willing to censor what the government wants censored. Then glowies flood any other communication platforms with illegal content, and they commence with the lawsuits and takedowns.
The CP and "calls to violence" get so out of hand that Congress passes new Internet regulation that puts the burden on service providers to police content, and allows the DOJ to seize all domain name that are subjects of an investigation. (they already do this for "piracy" which is just another form of speech)

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: add some words

They'll just remove Section 230 and replace it with a law that protects very specific categories of websites - those owned by big tech that are willing to censor what the government wants censored. Then glowies flood any other communication platforms with illegal content, and they commence with the lawsuits and takedowns.
The CP and "calls to violence" get so out of hand that Congress passes new Internet regulation that puts the burden on service providers to police content, and allows the DOJ to seize all domain name that are subjects of an investigation. (they already do this for "piracy" which is just another form of free speech)

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

They'll just remove Section 230 and replace it with a law that protects very specific categories of websites - those owned by big tech that are willing to censor what the government wants censored. Then glowies flood any other communication platforms with illegal content, and they commence with the lawsuits and takedowns.
The CP and "calls to violence" get so out of hand that Congress passes new Internet regulation that puts the burden on service providers to police content, and allows the DOJ to seize all domain name that are subjects of an investigation.

3 years ago
1 score