Technically, you can also be for big government IF the situation is one in which big government benefits from giving you want you want. Currently the structure in society is one in which strong government authorities won't align with what you desire.

It is difficult to come up with an example because if one were reasonable and feasible, it'd likely have been created already but on the abstract say there was an economic invention that dramatically enhanced the overall wealth of society like some sort of machine that only men could use effectively because it required physical strength that women lacked and where lots of children BUT NOT monogamous nuclear families led to a better outcome with said invention. The government would enhance its wealth and power if it was able to encourage more men to work this new invention while also encouraging more children in society but not necessarily care about monogamous nuclear families. In such a scenario you could have extreme government authority but such authority would lead to pressures that would likely encourage big tits in video games.

I would say it's less about people wanting to exert their own power and more about submission and obedience to the powers at play. The idea that leftists want to control liberty focused people to feel good about their own lack of power isn't accurate. Maybe for some outlier psychopathic leftists sure, that might be their motivation. The whole though, it's people being pressured by the system and submitting to their system. They want to encourage others to submit and obey to the system because that helps the system and given that they've submitted to the system they themselves want to enhance the system.

Technically, you can also be for big government IF the situation is one in which big government benefits from giving you want you want. Currently the structure in society is one in which strong government authorities won't align with what you desire.

It is difficult to come up with an example because if one were reasonable and feasible, it'd likely have been created already but on the abstract say there was an economic invention that dramatically enhanced the overall wealth of society like some sort of machine that only men could use effectively because it required physical strength that women lacked and where lots of children BUT NOT monogamous nuclear families led to a better outcome with said invention. The government would enhance its wealth and power if it was able to encourage more men to work this new invention while also encouraging more children in society but not necessarily care about monogamous nuclear families. In such a scenario you could have extreme government authority but such authority would lead to pressures that would likely encourage big tits in video games.

I would say it's less about people wanting to exert their own power and more about submission and obedience to the powers at play. The idea that leftists want to control liberty focused people to feel good about their own lack of power isn't accurate. Maybe for some outlier psychopathic leftists sure, that might be their motivation. The whole though, it's people being pressured by the system and submitting to their system. They want to encourage others to submit and obey to the system because that helps the system and given that they've submitted to the system they themselves want to enhance the system.

Technically, you can also be for big government IF the situation is one in which big government benefits from giving you want you want. Currently the structure is society is one in which strong government authorities won't align with what you desire.

It is difficult to come up with an example because if one were reasonable and feasible, it'd likely have been created already but on the abstract say there was an economic invention that dramatically enhanced the overall wealth of society like some sort of machine that only men could use effectively because it required physical strength that women lacked and where lots of children BUT NOT monogamous nuclear families led to a better outcome with said invention. The government would enhance its wealth and power if it was able to encourage more men to work this new invention while also encouraging more children in society but not necessarily care about monogamous nuclear families. In such a scenario you could have extreme government authority but such authority would lead to pressures that would likely encourage big tits in video games.

I would say it's less about people wanting to exert their own power and more about submission and obedience to the powers at play. The idea that leftists want to control liberty focused people to feel good about their own lack of power isn't accurate. Maybe for some outlier psychopathic leftists sure, that might be their motivation. The whole though, it's people being pressured by the system and submitting to their system. They want to encourage others to submit and obey to the system because that helps the system and given that they've submitted to the system they themselves want to enhance the system.

Technically, you can also be for big government IF the situation is one in which big government benefits from giving you want you want. Currently the structure is society is one in which strong government authorities won't align with what you desire.

It is difficult to come up with an example because if one were reasonable and feasible, it'd likely have been created already but on the abstract say there was an economic invention that dramatically enhanced the overall wealth of society like some sort of machine that only men could use effectively because it required physical strength that women lacked and where lots of children BUT NOT monogamous nuclear families led to a better outcome with said invention. The government would enhance its wealth and power if it was able to encourage more men to work this new invention while also encouraging more children in society but not necessarily care about monogamous nuclear families. In such a scenario you could have extreme government authority but such authority would lead to pressures that would likely encourage big tits in video games.

I would say it's less about people wanting to exert their own power and more about submission and obedience to the powers at play. The idea that leftists want to control liberty focused people to feel good about their own lack of people isn't accurate. Maybe for some outlier psychopathic leftists sure, that might be their motivation. The whole though, it's people being pressured by the system and submitting to their system. They want to encourage others to submit and obey to the system because that helps the system and given that they'd submitted to the system they themselves want to enhance the system.