[sexuality education] can significantly contribute to reducing sexual violence and harassment.

(Emphasis mine). That's an odd claim. How does reciting the statement "some guys like taking it up the ass, some gals prefer eating oysters" reduce sexual violence? I don't necessarily see it raising sexual violence, it could but I don't see that as a guarantee, but how does it not only reduce sexual violence, but SIGNIFICANTLY reduce it?

Bobbit out there saying "well, I was going to cut off my husband's dick for fun, but then I remembered that gay porn exists, and somehow, that makes me not commit sexual violence against my husband!".

Oh, maybe they're the type who believe women can't perpetrate sexual violence, I'm sorry, I'll just create a sex-appropriate example, and make them an offensive stereotype to make sure they listen since racism and stereotypes are the only language the Left understands...

Jumbo Jim gets back from the oil rig on his Texan farm to his wife-slave he keeps in the kitchen. Not barefoot, though, no, he binds copies of The Handmaid's Tale to her feet, instead, so she treads on her favorite story every step. He was about to jam his fist up her vagina, when he remembered his Sexuality education in school, and stopped, because fisting is what those lez-bee-ans do, and he ain't that.

That sound about right? Really, I'm not seeing how "lesbians and gay people exist" as a statement or educational curricula note will lead to less rape. Significantly less rape, notably. Are most rapists suppressed gays and lesbians or something, who rape because they weren't taught that their Self existed? Is that the EU's claim?

EDIT: Yes, I acknowledge the phrase was full of weasel words: can and contribute to, which make the phrase literally meaningless, selling ice cream can significantly contribute to reducing murder, if the "can" is contingent on a very specific situation and the "contribute to" is tangential and tenuous, say if a single incident throughout history, someone dodged a murder attempt because they went to an ice cream shop instead of their usual restaurant, then the statement would be true, "Can", because it happened once, and "signfiicantly contribute to" because in that singular instance it was a decisive factor... But I was reacting based on what they WANTED me to believe they meant, not what they likely ACTUALLY meant, which was "they could dream up some ridiculous farce of a singular example in which it significantly matters".

[sexuality education] can significantly contribute to reducing sexual violence and harassment.

(Emphasis mine). That's an odd claim. How does reciting the statement "some guys like taking it up the ass, some gals prefer eating oysters" reduce sexual violence? I don't necessarily see it raising sexual violence, it could but I don't see that as a guarantee, but how does it not only reduce sexual violence, but SIGNIFICANTLY reduce it?

Bobbit out there saying "well, I was going to cut off my husband's dick for fun, but then I remembered that gay porn exists, and somehow, that makes me not commit sexual violence against my husband!".

Oh, maybe they're the type who believe women can't perpetrate sexual violence, I'm sorry, I'll just create a sex-appropriate example, and make them an offensive stereotype to make sure they listen since racism and stereotypes are the only language the Left understands...

Jumbo Jim gets back from the oil rig on his Texan farm to his wife-slave he keeps in the kitchen. Not barefoot, though, no, he binds copies of The Handmaid's Tale to her feet, instead, so she treads on her favorite story every step. He was about to jam his fist up her vagina, when he remembered his Sexuality education in school, and stopped, because fisting is what those lez-bee-ans do, and he ain't that.

That sound about right? Really, I'm not seeing how "lesbians and gay people exist" as a statement or educational curricula note will lead to less rape. Significantly less rape, notably. Are most rapists suppressed gays and lesbians or something, who rape because they weren't taught that their Self existed? Is that the EU's claim?

[sexuality education] can significantly contribute to reducing sexual violence and harassment.

(Emphasis mine). That's an odd claim. How does reciting the statement "some guys like taking it up the ass, some gals prefer eating oysters" reduce sexual violence? I don't necessarily see it raising sexual violence, it could but I don't see that as a guarantee, but how does it not only reduce sexual violence, but SIGNIFICANTLY reduce it?

Bobbit out there saying "well, I was going to cut off my husband's dick for fun, but then I remembered that gay porn exists, and somehow, that makes me not commit sexual violence against my husband!".

Oh, maybe they're the type who believe women can't perpetrate sexual violence, I'm sorry, I'll just a sex-appropriate example, and make them an offensive stereotype to make sure they listen since racism and stereotypes are the only language the Left understands...

Jumbo Jim gets back from the oil rig on his Texan farm to his wife-slave he keeps in the kitchen. Not barefoot, though, no, he binds copies of The Handmaid's Tale to her feet, instead, so she treads on her favorite story every step. He was about to jam his fist up her vagina, when he remembered his Sexuality education in school, and stopped, because fisting is what those lez-bee-ans do, and he ain't that.

That sound about right? Really, I'm not seeing how "lesbians and gay people exist" as a statement or educational curricula note will lead to less rape. Are most rapists suppressed gays and lesbians or something, who rape because they weren't taught that their Self existed? Is that the EU's claim?