Is this a serious comment? Of course poor Muslims want to invade wealthy white nations. Who paved the way for the invasions? At least in America, you can blame neocons for seeking cheap labor - because Hispanic immigrants do work. But in Europe, where Muslim immigrants don't work?

https://cis.org/Report/Jewish-Stake-Americas-Changing-Demography

The Jewish position on immigration ebbs and flows depending on two factors:

1. Undermining the majority demographic's political and cultural power requires massive immigration, necessarily

2. Preventing the formation of a minority demographic that is hostile towards Jews, because brown people are not controlled by Holocaust guilt

Implied in all of this, by Jews themselves, is their outsized capacity to effect change in immigration policy. If the invasion was going to happen regardless, why would they even become involved?

But putting aside that implication, how would it characterize this attitude towards immigration? Is it not entirely hostile? Is the goal not to fundamentally alter and indeed destroy the preexisting culture and nation?

Is this a serious comment? Of course poor Muslims want to invade wealthy white nations. Who paved the way for the invasions? At least in America, you can blame neocons for seeking cheap labor - because Hispanic immigrants do work. But in Europe, where Muslim immigrants don't work?

https://cis.org/Report/Jewish-Stake-Americas-Changing-Demography

The Jewish position on immigration ebbs and flows depending on two factors:

1. Undermining the majority demographic's political and cultural power requires massive immigration, necessarily

2. Preventing the formation of a minority demographic that is hostile towards Jews, because brown people are not controlled by Holocaust guilt

Implied in all of this, by Jews themselves, is their outsized capacity to effect change in immigration policy. If the invasion was going to happen regardless, why would they even become involved?