The Court’s role is to interpret the law, not mete out (perceived) justice based on feelings. It’s not their fault that the law is the way it is, nor is it their duty to ignore what the law says to punish people, even if those people might deserve it.

ETA: The decision was unanimous, by the way.

The Court’s role is to interpret the law, not mete out (perceived) justice based on feelings. It’s not their fault that the law is the way it is, nor is it their duty to ignore what the law says to punish people, even if those people might deserve it.