I know his phrasing may be slightly schizio tier, please focus on the actual content.
With regard to
other things that have been noted but not tied to anything
Things that were very obvious deviations from the norm, like all the procedural and logistical disrepances surrounding the supposed inauguration for Biden, plus all the things he listed about the military stuff in DC that is still going on. At the time, they were taken as evidence for Trump's comeback (that never materialized). So many have written that stuff off as bullshit.
What strikes me as odd though is that, although their claimed conclusion did not come about, the events and disrepancies themselves definitely happened and most have not been refuted.
So what if it was actually legit, but not as proof of Trump's victory but as proof of something else?
Edited to add:
If anyone wants to see some examples of the actual discrepancies, this comment is a nice compilation
https://conspiracies.win/p/11SJoavtUS/x/c/4Dvm6t6m5ly
Not sure about the validity of the "movie set/film studio" claims, but all the stuff surrounding the military, symbolic, and logistical abnormalities listed both there and in the original screencap in this post, I would fully consider legit evidence of something unusual.
I know his phrasing may be slightly schizio tier, please focus on the actual content.
With regard to
other things that have been noted but not tied to anything
Things that were very obvious deviations from the norm, like all the procedural and logistical disrepances surrounding the supposed inauguration for Biden, plus all the things he listed about the military stuff in DC that is still going on. At the time, they were taken as evidence for Trump's comeback (that never materialized). So many have written that stuff off as bullshit.
What strikes me as odd though is that, although their claimed conclusion did not come about, the events and disrepancies themselves definitely happened and most have not been refuted.
So what if it was actually legit, but not as proof of Trump's victory but as proof of something else?
Edited to add:
If anyone wants to see some examples of the actual discrepancies, this comment is a nice compilation
https://conspiracies.win/p/11SJoavtUS/x/c/4Dvm6t6m5ly
Not sure about the validity of the "movie set/film studio" claims, but all the stuff surrounding the military, symbolic, and logistical abnormalities listed both there and in the original screencap in this post, I would fully consider legit evidence of something unusual.
I know his phrasing may be slightly schizio tier, please focus on the actual content.
With regard to
other things that have been noted but not tied to anything
Things that were very obvious deviations from the norm, like all the procedural and logistical disrepances surrounding the supposed inauguration for Biden, plus all the things he listed about the military stuff in DC that is still going on. At the time, they were taken as evidence for Trump's comeback (that never materialized). So many have written that stuff off as bullshit.
What strikes me as odd though is that, although their claimed conclusion did not come about, the events and disrepancies themselves definitely happened and most have not been refuted.
So what if it was actually legit, but not as proof of Trump's victory but as proof of something else?
Edited to add:
If anyone wants to see some examples of the actual discrepancies, this comment is a nice compilation
https://conspiracies.win/p/11SJoavtUS/x/c/4Dvm6t6m5ly
Not sure about the validity of the "movie set/film studio" claims, but all the stuff surrounding the military, symbolic, and logistical abnormalities I would fully consider legit evidence of something unusual.
I know his phrasing may be slightly schizio tier, please focus on the actual content.
With regard to
other things that have been noted but not tied to anything
Things that were very obvious deviations from the norm, like all the procedural and logistical disrepances surrounding the supposed inauguration for Biden. At the time, they were taken as evidence for Trump's comeback (that never materialized). So many have written that stuff off as bullshit.
What strikes me as odd though is that, although their claimed conclusion did not come about, the events and disrepancies themselves definitely happened and most have not been refuted.
So what if it was actually legit, but not as proof of Trump's victory but as proof of something else?
Edited to add:
If anyone wants to see some examples of the actual discrepancies, this comment is a nice compilation
https://conspiracies.win/p/11SJoavtUS/x/c/4Dvm6t6m5ly
Not sure about the validity of the "movie set/film studio" claims, but all the stuff surrounding the military, symbolic, and logistical abnormalities I would fully consider legit evidence of something unusual.
I know his phrasing may be slightly schizio tier, please focus on the actual content.
With regard to
other things that have been noted but not tied to anything
Things that were very obvious deviations from the norm, like all the procedural and logistical disrepances surrounding the supposed inauguration for Biden. At the time, they were taken as evidence for Trump's comeback (that never materialized). So many have written that stuff off as bullshit.
What strikes me as odd though is that, although their claimed conclusion did not come about, the events and disrepancies themselves definitely happened and most have not been refuted.
So what if it was actually legit, but not as proof of Trump's victory but as proof of something else?
Edited to add:
If anyone wants to see some examples of the actual discrepancies, this comment is a nice compilation
https://conspiracies.win/p/11SJoavtUS/x/c/4Dvm6t6m5ly
Not sure about the validity of the "movie set/film studio" claims, but all the stuff surrounding the military, symbolic, and logistical abnormalities I would fully consider legit evidence of something unusual.
I know his phrasing may be slightly schizio tier, please focus on the actual content.
With regard to
other things that have been noted but not tied to anything
Things that were very obvious deviations from the norm, like all the procedural and logistical disrepances surrounding the supposed inauguration for Biden. At the time, they were taken as evidence for Trump's comeback (that never materialized). So many have written that stuff off as bullshit.
What strikes me as odd though is that, although their claimed conclusion did not come about, the events and disrepancies themselves definitely happened and most have not been refuted.
So what if it was actually legit, but not as proof of Trump's victory but as proof of something else?
Edited to add:
If anyone wants to see some examples of the actual discrepancies, this comment is a nice compilation
https://conspiracies.win/p/11SJoavtUS/x/c/4Dvm6t6m5ly
Not sure about the validity of the "movie set/film studio" claims, but all the stuff surrounding the military, symbolic, and logistical abnormalities I would fully consider legit evidence of something unusual.
I know his phrasing may be schizio tier, please focus on the actual content.
With regard to
other things that have been noted but not tied to anything
Things that were very obvious deviations from the norm, like all the procedural and logistical disrepances surrounding the supposed inauguration for Biden. At the time, they were taken as evidence for Trump's comeback (that never materialized). So many have written that stuff off as bullshit.
What strikes me as odd though is that, although their claimed conclusion did not come about, the events and disrepancies themselves definitely happened and most have not been refuted.
So what if it was actually legit, but not as proof of Trump's victory but as proof of something else?
Edited to add:
If anyone wants to see some examples of the actual discrepancies, this comment is a nice compilation
https://conspiracies.win/p/11SJoavtUS/x/c/4Dvm6t6m5ly
Not sure about the validity of the "movie set/film studio" claims, but all the stuff surrounding the military, symbolic, and logistical abnormalities I would fully consider legit evidence of something unusual.
I know his phrasing may be schizio tier, please focus on the actual content.
With regard to
other things that have been noted but not tied to anything
Things that were very obvious deviations from the norm, like all the procedural and logistical disrepances surrounding the supposed inauguration for Biden. At the time, they were taken as evidence for Trump's comeback (that never materialized). So many have written that stuff off as bullshit.
What strikes me as odd though is that, although their claimed conclusion did not come about, the events and disrepancies themselves definitely happened and most have not been refuted.
So what if it was actually legit, but not as proof of Trump's victory but as proof of something else?
Edited to add:
If anyone wants to see some examples of the actual discrepancies, this comment is a nice compilation
https://conspiracies.win/p/11SJoavtUS/x/c/4Dvm6t6m5ly
Not sure about the validity of the "movie set/film studio" claims, but all the stuff surrounding the military, symbolic, and logistical abnormalities I would fully consider legit evidence of something unusual.
I know his phrasing may be schizio tier, please focus on the actual content.
With regard to
other things that have been noted but not tied to anything
Things that were very obvious deviations from the norm, like all the procedural and logistical disrepances surrounding the supposed inauguration for Biden. At the time, they were taken as evidence for Trump's comeback (that never materialized). So many have written that stuff off as bullshit.
What strikes me as odd though is that, although their claimed conclusion did not come about, the events and disrepancies themselves definitely happened and most have not been refuted.
So what if it was actually legit, but not as proof of Trump's victory but as proof of something else?