The flaw with your argument is that these people are as anti-Jew as they are anti-white. They support the Palestinians, they support the BDS movement, they support the mass movement of Muslims to countries that serve as sanctuaries for Jewish communities and oppose any effort to rein in their culture's worst tendencies.... they might be Jews but they aren't "the Jews," no more than Shaun King is representative of all whites.
Various leftist secular Jews are the ones doing this self hating routine.
No one is blaming ALL of the Jews.
What op suggests is merely pointing out that the "my fellow white people" clowns are not actually white people but are actually leftist individuals of a Jewish background pretending to be white.
Yes they are, the national socialists are, the alt-right conspiracists are, the non-jewish socialists are, the non-jewish communists are, the black national socialists are too.
Lots of people blame all of the Jews for the exact same reason they blame all of the whites. All you're doing is supporting their idiotic motte & bailey routine. They sitll embrace a racial theory of history, they still blame jews generally, they still advocate for the removal of jews, and then they say "but not all" and you give them credit where they don't fucking deserve it.
It's not any different from when feminists bitch about men generally, then laugh when you point out 'not all men' and say that they never said all men. Then, of course, some feminist shows her power level and goes "Yes, all men."
It's why I got my flair. Disagreeing with their antisemitism means that I must be a jew.
I blame jewish culture for a lot of problems. I can't give a clear and rigid definition for it, nor could I for any other culture. I have yet to git that gud. If I were to try defining it, I'd have to go over stereotypes and their values, which I don't think most people would receive that kind of argument well. I feel comfortable using it because I don't use it like a magic wand to explain problems, as OP seems to be indulging in.
But, yeah, it is kinda like the feminism thing. They've used the cultural angle as well, even if I don't think it holds water. People like using labels and putting everything in boxes. The bigger the box, the less useful it is for organizing (like blaming a gender) - yet a small box isn't necessarily useful unless you want to exhaust yourself playing hardcore individualist mode.
Labels like jew are also difficult because it's hard to tell if it's meant as race or religion or culture. Rather, it's hard to tell if the label is meant for people that chose to take the label (by adhering to a dogma or behaving by a certain set of standards), or people that had no choice in receiving the label (by being born).
The flaw with your argument is that these people are as anti-Jew as they are anti-white. They support the Palestinians, they support the BDS movement, they support the mass movement of Muslims to countries that serve as sanctuaries for Jewish communities and oppose any effort to rein in their culture's worst tendencies.... they might be Jews but they aren't "the Jews," no more than Shaun King is representative of all whites.
Various leftist secular Jews are the ones doing this self hating routine.
No one is blaming ALL of the Jews.
What op suggests is merely pointing out that the "my fellow white people" clowns are not actually white people but are actually leftist individuals of a Jewish background pretending to be white.
Yes they are, the national socialists are, the alt-right conspiracists are, the non-jewish socialists are, the non-jewish communists are, the black national socialists are too.
Lots of people blame all of the Jews for the exact same reason they blame all of the whites. All you're doing is supporting their idiotic motte & bailey routine. They sitll embrace a racial theory of history, they still blame jews generally, they still advocate for the removal of jews, and then they say "but not all" and you give them credit where they don't fucking deserve it.
It's not any different from when feminists bitch about men generally, then laugh when you point out 'not all men' and say that they never said all men. Then, of course, some feminist shows her power level and goes "Yes, all men."
It's why I got my flair. Disagreeing with their antisemitism means that I must be a jew.
I blame jewish culture for a lot of problems. I can't give a clear and rigid definition for it, nor could I for any other culture. I have yet to git that gud. If I were to try defining it, I'd have to go over stereotypes and their values, which I don't think most people would receive that kind of argument well. I feel comfortable using it because I don't use it like a magic wand to explain problems, as OP seems to be indulging in.
But, yeah, it is kinda like the feminism thing. They've used the cultural angle as well, even if I don't think it holds water. People like using labels and putting everything in boxes. The bigger the box, the less useful it is for organizing (like blaming a gender) - yet a small box isn't necessarily useful unless you want to exhaust yourself playing hardcore individualist mode.
Labels like jew are also difficult because it's hard to tell if it's meant as race or religion or culture. Rather, it's hard to tell if the label is meant for people that chose to take the label (by adhering to a dogma or behaving by a certain set of standards), or people that had no choice in receiving the label (by being born).
These all used to be synonymous, and not just for jews but for everyone.