Something shocking came up yesterday while watching Beanie Man's daily uploads. The "experts" are claiming that they expect 150 million voters in this election.
That's larger than my expectation. Let me be clear about what that means. 150 would be 15 million more votes than in 2016.
The sum total number of all votes cast by blacks in 2016: about 15 million.
The sum total number of all votes cast by hispanics in 2016: about 15 million.
The sum total number of all votes cast by asians in 2016: about 5 million.
The sum total number of all votes cast by "other" in 2016: about 4 million.
The sum total number of all votes cast by whites in 2016: about 98 million.
Somehow, I don't expect the number of black or hispanic votes to fucking double in the election. In fact the largest increase in raw vote totals by any other ethnic demographic that I can find going back to 1980 is 4. Just 4 million. But in 1992, about 13 million more whites votes showed up compared to 1988. Many were third party Ross Perot voters who hadn't been tapped before, as if white people were mass-activated by an anti-establishment option that advocated for economic improvements and a bit of labor protectionism. That 13 million white voter jump represented a 16.69% increase in the white vote between 1988 & 1992. 15 million more white voters from 2016 to 2020 would be a smaller percentage than that. I'm being conservative my estimates. No one's ready for 8 million white voters. They're damn sure not ready for closer to 13.
Everyone is wildly under-estimating whites, that's the thing that I've been harping on since I started looking at this data 4 years ago.
The Dems are underestimating whites because they can't get any more white votes past 40 million, well under 50%. So they built a racialist block coalition and they hoped blacks, hispanics, and unions would do the trick. It's failed, but they don't see it because they are believing their own spin. Just like they are buying into LBJ's spin about Goldwater. I remember people telling me in 2016 that white opinions & votes don't matter because they are already only 63% of the population, and by 2030, they'll be less than 50%.
Not only was their interpretation wrong, not only was how they measured 'white' wrong, but the votes show something wildly different. Whites are not a decreasing population. They are an increasing one, just increasing slower than some of the others. As Timmy realized sometime last year in a video I can't find anymore, white conservatives have a normal replacement rate. White leftists do not. White leftists have an out-group preference, higher suicide rates, and basically don't have children at all. Almost all white demographic growth is from conservatives.
That's why the Left don't get it. They're looking at only the whites they know, and they represent 55% of the Democratic vote. They've completely misunderstood the white vote, and they're not paying attention to the fact that white participation rates are increasing. They're all sitting there thinking they've set themselves up to win, and the reality is that they are setting themselves up to lose. They aren't appealing to whites, and if any Republican candidate manages to strip voters away from the Dems voting blocks, the whole thing is ruined. Guess who has the largest number of raw votes from Non-white demographics in Republican Party history? ... Trump.
It would be hilarious to see him get the stark opposite of what he is trying to force people to do at the ballot box instead.
Nobody's ready. I expect the racialists get very quiet, or leave. Considering the shithole that the UK is becoming, I wouldn't be surprised if they start moving there. Fucking Scotland complaining about how there's too many whites in Scotland...???...The MSM will probably have some bullshit about "mass exodus of minorities from Trump's terror state!"
Something shocking came up yesterday while watching Beanie Man's daily uploads. The "experts" are claiming that they expect 150 million voters in this election.
That's larger than my expectation. Let me be clear about what that means. 150 would be 15 million more votes than in 2016.
Somehow, I don't expect the number of black or hispanic votes to fucking double in the election. In fact the largest increase in raw vote totals by any other ethnic demographic that I can find going back to 1980 is 4. Just 4 million. But in 1992, about 13 million more whites votes showed up compared to 1988. Many were third party Ross Perot voters who hadn't been tapped before, as if white people were mass-activated by an anti-establishment option that advocated for economic improvements and a bit of labor protectionism. That 13 million white voter jump represented a 16.69% increase in the white vote between 1988 & 1992. 15 million more white voters from 2016 to 2020 would be a smaller percentage than that. I'm being conservative my estimates. No one's ready for 8 million white voters. They're damn sure not ready for closer to 13.
Hey.
Hey.
Wanna see a white-lash?
Interesting scenario you bring up.
Diddy was recently trying to threaten the incitement of a race war if whites voted for Trump.
It would be hilarious to see him get the stark opposite of what he is trying to force people to do at the ballot box instead.
Everyone is wildly under-estimating whites, that's the thing that I've been harping on since I started looking at this data 4 years ago.
The Dems are underestimating whites because they can't get any more white votes past 40 million, well under 50%. So they built a racialist block coalition and they hoped blacks, hispanics, and unions would do the trick. It's failed, but they don't see it because they are believing their own spin. Just like they are buying into LBJ's spin about Goldwater. I remember people telling me in 2016 that white opinions & votes don't matter because they are already only 63% of the population, and by 2030, they'll be less than 50%.
Not only was their interpretation wrong, not only was how they measured 'white' wrong, but the votes show something wildly different. Whites are not a decreasing population. They are an increasing one, just increasing slower than some of the others. As Timmy realized sometime last year in a video I can't find anymore, white conservatives have a normal replacement rate. White leftists do not. White leftists have an out-group preference, higher suicide rates, and basically don't have children at all. Almost all white demographic growth is from conservatives.
That's why the Left don't get it. They're looking at only the whites they know, and they represent 55% of the Democratic vote. They've completely misunderstood the white vote, and they're not paying attention to the fact that white participation rates are increasing. They're all sitting there thinking they've set themselves up to win, and the reality is that they are setting themselves up to lose. They aren't appealing to whites, and if any Republican candidate manages to strip voters away from the Dems voting blocks, the whole thing is ruined. Guess who has the largest number of raw votes from Non-white demographics in Republican Party history? ... Trump.
Nobody's ready. I expect the racialists get very quiet, or leave. Considering the shithole that the UK is becoming, I wouldn't be surprised if they start moving there. Fucking Scotland complaining about how there's too many whites in Scotland...???...The MSM will probably have some bullshit about "mass exodus of minorities from Trump's terror state!"