I dunno about evicting them to a third-world country, but I've often been a huge proponent of "workfare" instead of "welfare". Y'know who doesn't have time to pop out a pack of kids? Women who are working. Start up a government training program that first centers on child care/food preparation and sock them into that as a requirement to get their monthly stipend. Force them to get GEDs if they don't already have a high school diploma. That way the ones who are having 12 kids by 10 baby-daddies will be properly trained in running a child care facility and Woman A can look after Woman B's kids at the state child care center while Woman B is getting trained for some other state-sponsored position. Once enough of them are trained for non-child-care jobs, put them into state-run positions as well, and make that their job. Guaran-damn-tee you that they'll stop popping out kids if they're too tired from working and they have to do so to keep their housing and monthly money.
And don't get increases based just on how many kids they have.
That's the real flaw with welfare no matter the jurisdiction; it doesn't exist as a hand-up that connects its clients with proper education/training and jobs afterwards, especially when the private sector is dead set against hiring people with work gaps, or who they know are on welfare/living in a shelter. It needs total reform across the board, everywhere in the West. It's frustrating, and gets you nowhere, as if it's designed to keep you from getting anywhere in the first place.
I dunno about evicting them to a third-world country, but I've often been a huge proponent of "workfare" instead of "welfare". Y'know who doesn't have time to pop out a pack of kids? Women who are working. Start up a government training program that first centers on child care/food preparation and sock them into that as a requirement to get their monthly stipend. Force them to get GEDs if they don't already have a high school diploma. That way the ones who are having 12 kids by 10 baby-daddies will be properly trained in running a child care facility and Woman A can look after Woman B's kids at the state child care center while Woman B is getting trained for some other state-sponsored position. Once enough of them are trained for non-child-care jobs, put them into state-run positions as well, and make that their job. Guaran-damn-tee you that they'll stop popping out kids if they're too tired from working and they have to do so to keep their housing and monthly money.
And don't get increases based just on how many kids they have.
That's the real flaw with welfare no matter the jurisdiction; it doesn't exist as a hand-up that connects its clients with proper education/training and jobs afterwards, especially when the private sector is dead set against hiring people with work gaps, or who they know are on welfare/living in a shelter. It needs total reform across the board, everywhere in the West. It's frustrating, and gets you nowhere, as if it's designed to keep you from getting anywhere in the first place.