If I say that if a baseball team won the World Series, and that it must therefore be the New York Yankees, whether or not the Yankees actually win the World Series on a given year is irrelevant to the fact that my argument is fundamentally invalid.
Again, you're demonstrating the problem:
Your logic is flawed, but if the outcome is not what you want, you dismiss it. If the outcome is what you want, it's vindication.
What was that?
I'm gloating a little because I was right, but I do respect you.
Your assertion still doesn't make any sense.
If I say that if a baseball team won the World Series, and that it must therefore be the New York Yankees, whether or not the Yankees actually win the World Series on a given year is irrelevant to the fact that my argument is fundamentally invalid.
Again, you're demonstrating the problem:
Your logic is flawed, but if the outcome is not what you want, you dismiss it. If the outcome is what you want, it's vindication.
But I actually did have an argument - feminism is the only progressive movement that has real power in Canada, therefore it has to be one of theirs.
You didn't say that, though. You just said:
Which when taken literally, you have to admit is crazy.
It was only ever going to be a feminist or a BLM cultist.
The fact that Canada's BLM is reduced to seething on Twitter means it had to be the former.