The new Watch Dogs Legion is all about gender but you gotta make sure you pick the right one!
https://www.reddit.com/r/watch_dogs/comments/im60h9/what_you_trying_to_say_ubi/
The new Watch Dogs Legion is all about gender but you gotta make sure you pick the right one!
https://www.reddit.com/r/watch_dogs/comments/im60h9/what_you_trying_to_say_ubi/
Because the flip in their vote is likely going to doom us all. Just like 2018.
They're so enticed by the promise of legal murder that they will do it. Bet your life on it.
Black men need to go (R) to save us. They're the last hope we have.
I am because that's fucking idiocy, and it tells me you don't encounter women, or even have any knowledge of them outside a couple bad experiences and self-radicalization. It's so wrong that it doesn't even stand to basic scrutiny related to actual female murder. If we took explicit female murders who intended to murder their male partners, most of those murders wouldn't need legalization. When women commit murder it's through poisoning and subterfuge, and things like that. They don't just go up to people and shoot them in the face. That's a male-typical form of murder.
I don't know how to explain this to you besides: women don't care about you.
Women are not working in a cabal to murder an entire sex. That's genuine fucking madness based on absolutely nothing.
Please imply I am an incel more, I'm sure it makes you sound so credible. I do encounter them, but I'm not stupid enough to ask them about politics beyond casually bringing up feminism to see if they need to be completely avoided. Nobody who knows me in real life except for my family would ever know my true opinions on anything political, why wouldn't it be the same for them? Only a complete lunatic would tell you "Yes, I want to kill you and everyone like you" to your face.
Also, why would you trust their answer to the question? How many murderers do they have to praise, how many calls to violence do they have to post? Donna Hylton has now appeared twice for their side as a speaker after her sadistic murder of a man.
Most of the murders that were plead down to manslaughter by women, thanks to their new law in the UK, were violent beatings where the murderer clearly took pleasure in them.
How can you keep seeing the same ideas and people crop up and believe that it's nothing? I get the whole #NotAll thing and even I'm not sure of what the number of them that support this will be (the election will show those numbers, because this really is about whether we are considered human or not.) but to dismiss the whole point out of hand seems absurd.
I didn't call you an incel. I told you that your opinions are so completely unrelated to reality that you've painted the idea of women into a kind of cartoon villain akin to Carnage, or The Red Skull. It's ridiculous and assinine. That has nothing to do with celibacy.
Because most people, particularly women are far more social than you.
Only a complete lunatic would have that as an opinion. That is not a normal human opinion for the vast and sweeping majority of humans. Again: comic book level shit.
Because most normal humans answer honestly. This year happens to be one where people will test you before they answer, but most people answer honestly (even if not to expose their full 'power level').
"they", who is "they"? Again, you're just asserting all women in place of radical gender communists who support murder. Why would you give credibility to these freaks? Just because they say that they represent women, it doesn't make it true.
Yes, Gender Communists are psychos. Yes, the corporatists like using it as a wedge issue. No, this isn't "women" as a whole.
It's not nothing, it's communism. Women do not run around screeching about the importance of political lesbianism and radical female liberation through violent revolution. In fact, as I said before, open violence is atypical for females.
First of all, yes, most women think that men are human.
Second, as demonstrated by my first sentence, I'm dismissing your point because it's patently absurd. Your points are hyperfocusing on the most radical and insane positions of Revolutionary Communists. You are then complaining about the tacit support of Useful Idiots who tend to understand vanishingly little about their own ideology, and equating them as the same. Then you are taking all that and applying it to literally 51% of the human population. The vast and sweeping majority of whom are not even Feminists. It's nonsense.
You're not just making sweeping generalizations. You're identifying the most extreme positions held by a miniscule number, and placing it on the shoulders of the majority of Earths' population.
It's not just an absurd generalization. It's the most absurd generalization. I have the right to dismiss both our of hand, and with prejudice.
Not my fault if that's literally how their groups act.
Ad hominem part 2. Granted, I'm not the most social person, but I'm not the loser caricature you're implying. Although I probably spend way too much time on my phone, no matter where I am.
You even admit that people don't reveal their full beliefs in your paragraph here. Nobody is giving anything in 2020. I'm certainly not.
Female supremacists*
But no, I'm not. I just hate playing #NotAll because it serves absolutely no purpose in dealing with the actual problem. You can say it and point to the voter figures that show women are something like 53/47 in favor of the left - but those are skewed by women who are elderly. We are screwed when they start dying because every generation below them is more and more feminist.
Didn't exactly do much to stop it though. I'm not going to go full BLM "silence is violence" because that's absurd, but I'm just going to point out that women came out in droves there to complain about Brexit and Boris Johnson's "harassment" case last year and support BLM this year, yet they did nothing when it was decided that women killing men would be manslaughter charges (maximum 2 years, can be a suspended sentence if no prior record) not murder.
They're not exactly showing their support for our humanity.
Because they'd lose the fight. No such danger when your victim is sleeping and you have a weapon. Hence the legal murder.
Who said violent revolution? They're going to seize power with the Biden/Harris ticket, Biden will be pensioned off for senility and they've already defeated Trump so they now have power. Then they'll sneak the legal murder in with some bullshit about it being needed to protect women from DV. Easy as that, no need for a revolution.
When they say kill all men, they don't actually mean an Einsatzgruppen march shooting people in the street. They mean making our lives borderline unlivable and making it legal for a woman to kill us if she pleases. There won't be death camps and firing squads.
Also, most of their behaviors now are atypical, but they are still happening.
points to huge list of tweets with hundreds of thousands of likes that are contrary to this.
We'll see at the election. I'm willing to back down if they end up helping put Trump into office and prevent the hell Harris wants.