The new Watch Dogs Legion is all about gender but you gotta make sure you pick the right one!
https://www.reddit.com/r/watch_dogs/comments/im60h9/what_you_trying_to_say_ubi/
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (40)
sorted by:
Please imply I am an incel more, I'm sure it makes you sound so credible. I do encounter them, but I'm not stupid enough to ask them about politics beyond casually bringing up feminism to see if they need to be completely avoided. Nobody who knows me in real life except for my family would ever know my true opinions on anything political, why wouldn't it be the same for them? Only a complete lunatic would tell you "Yes, I want to kill you and everyone like you" to your face.
Also, why would you trust their answer to the question? How many murderers do they have to praise, how many calls to violence do they have to post? Donna Hylton has now appeared twice for their side as a speaker after her sadistic murder of a man.
Most of the murders that were plead down to manslaughter by women, thanks to their new law in the UK, were violent beatings where the murderer clearly took pleasure in them.
How can you keep seeing the same ideas and people crop up and believe that it's nothing? I get the whole #NotAll thing and even I'm not sure of what the number of them that support this will be (the election will show those numbers, because this really is about whether we are considered human or not.) but to dismiss the whole point out of hand seems absurd.
I didn't call you an incel. I told you that your opinions are so completely unrelated to reality that you've painted the idea of women into a kind of cartoon villain akin to Carnage, or The Red Skull. It's ridiculous and assinine. That has nothing to do with celibacy.
Because most people, particularly women are far more social than you.
Only a complete lunatic would have that as an opinion. That is not a normal human opinion for the vast and sweeping majority of humans. Again: comic book level shit.
Because most normal humans answer honestly. This year happens to be one where people will test you before they answer, but most people answer honestly (even if not to expose their full 'power level').
"they", who is "they"? Again, you're just asserting all women in place of radical gender communists who support murder. Why would you give credibility to these freaks? Just because they say that they represent women, it doesn't make it true.
Yes, Gender Communists are psychos. Yes, the corporatists like using it as a wedge issue. No, this isn't "women" as a whole.
It's not nothing, it's communism. Women do not run around screeching about the importance of political lesbianism and radical female liberation through violent revolution. In fact, as I said before, open violence is atypical for females.
First of all, yes, most women think that men are human.
Second, as demonstrated by my first sentence, I'm dismissing your point because it's patently absurd. Your points are hyperfocusing on the most radical and insane positions of Revolutionary Communists. You are then complaining about the tacit support of Useful Idiots who tend to understand vanishingly little about their own ideology, and equating them as the same. Then you are taking all that and applying it to literally 51% of the human population. The vast and sweeping majority of whom are not even Feminists. It's nonsense.
You're not just making sweeping generalizations. You're identifying the most extreme positions held by a miniscule number, and placing it on the shoulders of the majority of Earths' population.
It's not just an absurd generalization. It's the most absurd generalization. I have the right to dismiss both our of hand, and with prejudice.
Not my fault if that's literally how their groups act.
Ad hominem part 2. Granted, I'm not the most social person, but I'm not the loser caricature you're implying. Although I probably spend way too much time on my phone, no matter where I am.
You even admit that people don't reveal their full beliefs in your paragraph here. Nobody is giving anything in 2020. I'm certainly not.
Female supremacists*
But no, I'm not. I just hate playing #NotAll because it serves absolutely no purpose in dealing with the actual problem. You can say it and point to the voter figures that show women are something like 53/47 in favor of the left - but those are skewed by women who are elderly. We are screwed when they start dying because every generation below them is more and more feminist.
Didn't exactly do much to stop it though. I'm not going to go full BLM "silence is violence" because that's absurd, but I'm just going to point out that women came out in droves there to complain about Brexit and Boris Johnson's "harassment" case last year and support BLM this year, yet they did nothing when it was decided that women killing men would be manslaughter charges (maximum 2 years, can be a suspended sentence if no prior record) not murder.
They're not exactly showing their support for our humanity.
Because they'd lose the fight. No such danger when your victim is sleeping and you have a weapon. Hence the legal murder.
Who said violent revolution? They're going to seize power with the Biden/Harris ticket, Biden will be pensioned off for senility and they've already defeated Trump so they now have power. Then they'll sneak the legal murder in with some bullshit about it being needed to protect women from DV. Easy as that, no need for a revolution.
When they say kill all men, they don't actually mean an Einsatzgruppen march shooting people in the street. They mean making our lives borderline unlivable and making it legal for a woman to kill us if she pleases. There won't be death camps and firing squads.
Also, most of their behaviors now are atypical, but they are still happening.
points to huge list of tweets with hundreds of thousands of likes that are contrary to this.
We'll see at the election. I'm willing to back down if they end up helping put Trump into office and prevent the hell Harris wants.
Only the most extreme groups... which are, again, Leftist.
Great, then accept responsibility for the fact that men are unquestionably violent and savage, and given the crime statistics hate women to an extreme degree and want them all dead. I'm not going to let nuance get in the way of my blanket condemnations.
Normally, this would be hyperbole, but it's literally your argument.
That's not true, and never has been. Stop buying into leftist narratives if you oppose leftism.
Women were in the groups whose ideological positions you oppose, and therefore all women are to blame and you can indict them on their silence. You are giving yourself an unfalsifiable argument as to why women are always the problem:
This isn't any different than anything the alt-right does.
"They"? Whom? You're answer is going to be just women, and you're going to refuse to accept that it's the most extreme gender communists and "political lesbians" (aka: sexual predators) You're still misattributing, and you won't accept anything else.
"Twitter is the real world!"
So, your argument is that their prominent positions are purely happenstance and the radical views were going to be espoused either way?
Except those men are raised by women without male influences in their life from childhood onwards. Why should I accept responsibility for their fuck ups? If you factor in Antifa trash, there are probably more women from stable households who have committed violent crimes than men.
My point wasn't that they are wrong by default, it was simply showing that they are capable of taking action...when they give a fuck about what's happening.