Harvard tweets 2+2 = 5 . This only part of why we must purge academia of all Marxists, Post-Modernists and SJWs.
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (54)
sorted by:
It's not "trickery" - he's arguing for SUBJECTIVE math where "facts" can mean different things depending upon "context". Y'know like... race... or sex... or whatever the communists into thought control want you to believe today. The point is to take away your agency. YOU are never qualified to form your own opinion as to what is real - those in charge will tell you citizen.
That's why there's "57 genders" (with new ones being discovered every day). That's why Feminists are now evil if they don't believe that men are women.
It's not about truth or objectivity anymore - it's all about destabilizing the populace and to keep changing the narrative so that they either give up or slovenly follow the edicts from on high.
Don't let them know Euler used pi everything he did with circles. They'll want to replace 3.14 with a black number.
You've heard the story about how a state government wanted to change Pi from 3.14 to just "3" because they thought that would make math easier for children?
The bill was written and it had the votes to pass until a mathematician stepped in during a recess and the bill was tabled on return from recess.
That is unsurprising. Our schools are cancer. We need tanks in Harvard Yard.
I'd support the voiding of all academic degrees. What were they really used for? Pretty much just to make an appeal to authority in order to convince a potential employer that you know your stuff. The paper only offers a guarantee that you cleared your curriculum credits, even a straight D student can do that. There's no guarantee that they had decent teachers or any sort of standardization in their testing (and even standardization doesn't prevent it from being the old memorization test that tests only short term learning).
I'd much prefer individual employers being responsible for the testing of aptitude and knowledge in every potential employee. If the employer's one of the lazy fucks that doesn't even check references after asking for them, they can just give a dummy test with multiple choice answers to reflect their own investment.
Though I imagine some points of failure in this, such as there being enough lazy fucks to make a market for outsourcing their aptitude tests, then those third parties homogenizing their testing to open up a diploma system where you can take a test once and be cleared for all future tests. Or some anti-discrimination legislature being passed to restrict what is allowed to be tested. I know, it's no perfect solution.