You can read the actual link if you want all the details. Just because you don't like my title doesn't make it inaccurate. Just let it go. I took a look at your comment history and it seems like you are a reasonable person aside from this attempt to join the dogpile against me.
I'm not dogpiling you, I'm providing constructive criticism so that next time you have something you want people to read, you know how to convince people to read it.
Except that's a moving of the goalpost. First you said my title was inaccurate (which is a lie), now you're claiming to offer me SEO advice? Gotta admit, this is a much higher caliber of trolling than your comrades but you don't need to engage in this behavior, your commentary in other threads is decent enough on its own to get you attention.
It's inaccurate in its vagueness. "Human does bad thing" is an accurate title whenever some guy gets robbed at gun point but it doesn't accurately describe the fact that a guy got robbed at gunpoint
"Jesus Christ died well over two weeks ago now" is entirely true, no lies, but it is still an incredibly inaccurate statement to make that specifically attempts to get people to draw the wrong conclusion. "Communists killed over a half dozen people in their regime, compared to Nazis who killed over six million" is also entirely true, no lies, their ten+ million they killed is indeed over a half dozen, but the wording of the title is inaccurate in that it attempts to make you draw incorrect conclusions.
This is pretty simple, cut and dry stuff. Go collect your fifty cents from the CCP or ShareBlue or wheverever it is you do agitprop, and move on, you lost this one.
You can read the actual link if you want all the details. Just because you don't like my title doesn't make it inaccurate. Just let it go. I took a look at your comment history and it seems like you are a reasonable person aside from this attempt to join the dogpile against me.
I'm not dogpiling you, I'm providing constructive criticism so that next time you have something you want people to read, you know how to convince people to read it.
Except that's a moving of the goalpost. First you said my title was inaccurate (which is a lie), now you're claiming to offer me SEO advice? Gotta admit, this is a much higher caliber of trolling than your comrades but you don't need to engage in this behavior, your commentary in other threads is decent enough on its own to get you attention.
It's inaccurate in its vagueness. "Human does bad thing" is an accurate title whenever some guy gets robbed at gun point but it doesn't accurately describe the fact that a guy got robbed at gunpoint
"Inaccuracy" doesn't mean "a lie".
"Jesus Christ died well over two weeks ago now" is entirely true, no lies, but it is still an incredibly inaccurate statement to make that specifically attempts to get people to draw the wrong conclusion. "Communists killed over a half dozen people in their regime, compared to Nazis who killed over six million" is also entirely true, no lies, their ten+ million they killed is indeed over a half dozen, but the wording of the title is inaccurate in that it attempts to make you draw incorrect conclusions.
This is pretty simple, cut and dry stuff. Go collect your fifty cents from the CCP or ShareBlue or wheverever it is you do agitprop, and move on, you lost this one.