That's exactly what it is. They made up something that NOBODY says as an "equivalent" and bombarded the rest of the entry with different versions of "no u".
I still use "no u" on libtards sometimes. It triggers them really badly for some reason.
Especially funny, since I've seen people unironically calling themselves "anarcho-communists". Which is beyond paradoxical. How can you have a minimalist government that controls practically, if not literally, every aspect of people's lives?
They sincerely believe you just need to explain to anyone how awesome anarco-communism is and people will naturally and enthousiastically abide by its most charitable interpretation of the principles.
It ignores basically everything about human nature aside from empathy, fairness and indignation. Also ignores some people are just functionally retarded and won't understand or repress their pulsions for immediate satisfaction, a majority of people in some cases we are forbidden to talk about in polite society.
You can't have a functional socio-economic paradigm that ignores humans are also guided by superstitions, traditions, guilt, shame, spirituality, envy, tribal/racial kindship, desire for recognition and achievement on and individual and trial/national levels, competition, anger, destructive pulsions, reproduction, etc.
Western societies seem stuck in a neurotic paradox where they throw their traditions, history and spirituality in the woodchipper, deny reproduction is a necessity for existence, etc... For their own founding-block population, but recognize it for foreigners, especially those they import en-masse to replace their founding populations shrinking at 30% per generation.
A subspecies with that generational population shrinking over multiple generations would be classed as endangered. Most Western nations are now at that point.
"Anarcho-Communists" fall into two broad categories: those who want genuine anarchy so they can establish a voluntarist collective according to Marxist principles (harmless, moral, still misguided), and those who are Anarcho-Tyrannists (they wish to implement the worst elements of anarchy under the aegis of the State to avoid retribution or common self-defense) in order to bring about Global Totalitarian Communism (so they can join the commissar class).
The latter group is deeply amoral, extremely misguided, and should be treated seriously, no matter how pathetic they are, because given the chance, they will murder everyone who opposes them. The only things holding them back right now are their own weakness and cowardice, which is why the corporatist class (who intend to subvert the Glorious Revolution to cement themselves as a permanent ruling class) are hell-bent on encouraging these swine.
That's exactly what it is. They made up something that NOBODY says as an "equivalent" and bombarded the rest of the entry with different versions of "no u".
I still use "no u" on libtards sometimes. It triggers them really badly for some reason.
It's because you're not taking them seriously. They're deeply serious people worthy of your time and consideration. In their minds at least.
"K" gets the same reaction
Yeah, but for some reason, "no u" sets them off more than "k" and "ok groomer" by a lot. At least when I do it.
I believe "Cool story, bro" has a similar effect.
Its like dealing with a woman.
The act of not arguing with them enrages them more than actually arguing.
Especially funny, since I've seen people unironically calling themselves "anarcho-communists". Which is beyond paradoxical. How can you have a minimalist government that controls practically, if not literally, every aspect of people's lives?
They sincerely believe you just need to explain to anyone how awesome anarco-communism is and people will naturally and enthousiastically abide by its most charitable interpretation of the principles.
It ignores basically everything about human nature aside from empathy, fairness and indignation. Also ignores some people are just functionally retarded and won't understand or repress their pulsions for immediate satisfaction, a majority of people in some cases we are forbidden to talk about in polite society.
You can't have a functional socio-economic paradigm that ignores humans are also guided by superstitions, traditions, guilt, shame, spirituality, envy, tribal/racial kindship, desire for recognition and achievement on and individual and trial/national levels, competition, anger, destructive pulsions, reproduction, etc.
Western societies seem stuck in a neurotic paradox where they throw their traditions, history and spirituality in the woodchipper, deny reproduction is a necessity for existence, etc... For their own founding-block population, but recognize it for foreigners, especially those they import en-masse to replace their founding populations shrinking at 30% per generation.
A subspecies with that generational population shrinking over multiple generations would be classed as endangered. Most Western nations are now at that point.
"Anarcho-Communists" fall into two broad categories: those who want genuine anarchy so they can establish a voluntarist collective according to Marxist principles (harmless, moral, still misguided), and those who are Anarcho-Tyrannists (they wish to implement the worst elements of anarchy under the aegis of the State to avoid retribution or common self-defense) in order to bring about Global Totalitarian Communism (so they can join the commissar class).
The latter group is deeply amoral, extremely misguided, and should be treated seriously, no matter how pathetic they are, because given the chance, they will murder everyone who opposes them. The only things holding them back right now are their own weakness and cowardice, which is why the corporatist class (who intend to subvert the Glorious Revolution to cement themselves as a permanent ruling class) are hell-bent on encouraging these swine.