A legal mandate to wear condoms for the general population is an existential threat to humanity. It's not the same thing as wearing a mask while on public transport with hundreds of random strangers.
Why can't you mandate condoms when the couple isn't married? Or ban homosexual sex (specifically anal, which is at particularly high risk of transmitting HIV/AIDS and by definition is non-procreative)? Neither of those things are an existential threat to humanity.
A legal mandate to wear condoms for the general population is an existential threat to humanity. It's not the same thing as wearing a mask while on public transport with hundreds of random strangers.
Why can't you mandate condoms when the couple isn't married? Or ban homosexual sex (specifically anal, which is at particularly high risk of transmitting HIV/AIDS and by definition is non-procreative)? Neither of those things are an existential threat to humanity.