Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

29
WOTC are not inclusive enough they need to "DO BETTER" (boundingintocomics.com)
posted 5 years ago by Galean 5 years ago by Galean +29 / -0
20 comments share
20 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (20)
sorted by:
▲ 8 ▼
– Wizardslayer 8 points 5 years ago +8 / -0

Corporate Creep is part of it. It's not enough to be content with your market share(I'm willing to bet that the TTRPG market has been rather stable in numbers for decades) you have to include more and more people and conform to their wishes in order to get them in, whether it is dumbing down the rules to make it more accessible or listening to people that don't play(and probably never will) what they want to see in the game to get them to play. Meanwhile they do this with the belief that the old fans will stick around no matter what.

So now since the SJW crowd is that market they think they can tap that market and because a few developers are SJWS themselves. But they fail to realize that the people making all the noise were never fans to begin with and never will pick up the game after the changes are made. Because if there really was a market for it those SJW developers would have went and developed a new game for them and got the profits instead of trying to convince WoTC to do it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– Galean [S] 7 points 5 years ago +7 / -0

Increasing their market share is the excuse SJW developers are using to make what they like and they blame toxic masculinity and racism if it is not popular. This keeps them immune to criticism even internally. Since anyone who does not like it is a racist.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Galean [S] 4 points 5 years ago +4 / -0

And the dumbing down of rules is just as bad as SJW stuff. Things are suppose to be hard so you have a feeling of achievement when you succeed in playing correctly but heaven forbid some idiot would feel left out. I'm also noticing a resentment against players that like to min/max characters. It was subtle at first but is growing.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Wizardslayer 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

D&D lost me at 4th edition because of that. It became way too simple.

And the anger at min maxing always was strange to me. Everyone plays differently.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– tacticaltossaway 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

I'm also noticing a resentment against players that like to min/max characters. It was subtle at first but is growing.

There's always been bit of jibing at minmaxers as long as I've been around. I started like 20 years ago.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– HotPocketS 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

Minmaxing in moderation is okay, nobody wants shitty characters that take a dirt nap after being lightly jostled by a kobold, the problem is when munchkins purposefully break the game by exploiting loopholes and poorly playtested rulesets.

I like light rulesets precisely because they discourage such behaviour. Less is more.

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - pv4fp (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy