Ain't that a huge kick in the nuts to the tax paying people of the UK.
What really annoys me about the more progressive open borders people is they support this crap and label anyone who doesn't racist. If you ask most people who disagree with mass illegal immigration why, they'll tell you they simply want people to enter a country legally and pay their share of taxes -- it's not some earth-shattering proclamation, they just don't want to pay taxes for people who won't pay taxes that support the country.
Nigel mentioned the 10-year cost being a minimum of 2 billion pounds, imagine how much good that large amount of money could have done for the actual taxpayers of a country.
Same shit in Ireland. We have what we call "direct provision" centers , that are nearly always hotels for these people to stay in while processing theirs claims, which nearly always get rejected. We don't deport these people when they fail in their claim, we let them stay in the country illegally or they get what we call "leave to remain" which is essentially them getting a quasi citizenship status even they have not meet the standards needed for asylum. It's a colossal joke, which will kill my nation and it's people, yet no one cares.
I understand why people would be annoyed about this, but one thing I will say about Farage is that he understands politics. I like Sargon, but his foray into mainstream politics was an unmitigated disaster. It would have damaged Farage considerably if he'd endorsed Benjamin.
There's a difference between not supporting people and going out of your way to attack them. He was all but calling Tommy Robinson a Nazi, and he did the same to Anne-Marie Waters too from my remembrance. He'd throw anyone under the bus for more power, and his actions only help the left when it comes to their control of the overton window. I get your points, but this is not how you take back control, you're still surrendering ideological space to our enemies. This is an approach that should be outright rejected, as it placates the beast, when we really need to destroy the beast instead.
Ain't that a huge kick in the nuts to the tax paying people of the UK.
What really annoys me about the more progressive open borders people is they support this crap and label anyone who doesn't racist. If you ask most people who disagree with mass illegal immigration why, they'll tell you they simply want people to enter a country legally and pay their share of taxes -- it's not some earth-shattering proclamation, they just don't want to pay taxes for people who won't pay taxes that support the country.
Nigel mentioned the 10-year cost being a minimum of 2 billion pounds, imagine how much good that large amount of money could have done for the actual taxpayers of a country.
The only thing I'm concerned about is countries being destroyed on purpose.
Same shit in Ireland. We have what we call "direct provision" centers , that are nearly always hotels for these people to stay in while processing theirs claims, which nearly always get rejected. We don't deport these people when they fail in their claim, we let them stay in the country illegally or they get what we call "leave to remain" which is essentially them getting a quasi citizenship status even they have not meet the standards needed for asylum. It's a colossal joke, which will kill my nation and it's people, yet no one cares.
Ah, it's the guy who stood with Phillips against Sargon. Fucking cuckold.
I understand why people would be annoyed about this, but one thing I will say about Farage is that he understands politics. I like Sargon, but his foray into mainstream politics was an unmitigated disaster. It would have damaged Farage considerably if he'd endorsed Benjamin.
There's a difference between not supporting people and going out of your way to attack them. He was all but calling Tommy Robinson a Nazi, and he did the same to Anne-Marie Waters too from my remembrance. He'd throw anyone under the bus for more power, and his actions only help the left when it comes to their control of the overton window. I get your points, but this is not how you take back control, you're still surrendering ideological space to our enemies. This is an approach that should be outright rejected, as it placates the beast, when we really need to destroy the beast instead.