UK Rapper makes some veyry naughty tweets
(imgur.com)
Comments (22)
sorted by:
Is that true? About jews being 78% of slave owners and that the atlantic slave trade was owned by the jews? LIke how the fuck do jews go around blaming whites while claiming they are not white? I, a guy of Romanian decent have to suffer discrimination and being made to feel guilt on a regular bases based on the level of melanin I have because the jews did some shit while THEY are the victims? No one should have to be punished for what their ancestors did but this level of hypocrisy makes me fucking angry.
Basically, no. Even the statistic itself doesn't make any sense because the claim is about slave owners, and the evidence is about slave ships. Most slave owners would have been from whatever Empire they were in, or whatever state they were in. Slave ships could have been owned by specific people, but many also operated out of constructed companies. Jews were merchants, and by definition you can expect that some merchant ships were also able to move and transport slaves, but it's a far stretch to argue that one of the oldest human institutions was run almost exclusively by Jews.
To be honest, I'm not even sure how they would be able to even measure such a thing accurately when basically every place on Earth would have had slaves.
I think it is only about the salves from America. And the Atlantic Slave Trade. The Atlantic Slave Trade would be somewhat verifiable by checking who owned the boats as I expect that most of them had the same owners probably just a handful of them. As for owners in US who had slaves, that I agree that it does seem far fetched but who knows. I have no idea if there are any records of that, I do remember that a very small percentage of Americans actually had slaves but I have not double checked that either :P
Most of the slave owners in America would have been Protestant, not Jewish. Again, the boats weren't necessarily owned by slave owners, just slave traders. And who were slave traders? Lots of people, including Africans, Dutch, French, and Portuguese.
Slavery is basically a bourgeois activity. Only the very rich could really afford it unless you had a weird situation where you just had one slave that was a domestic servant.
How can you believe anything when you have to completely question everything that is common knowledge. You can't even say anything in public at risk of getting ostracized or worse.
I say whatever I want in public and face zero consequences.
Why?
Because I don't cuck out. Women respect strength and cannot attack attractive men. Soyboys respect nothing, but in their hearts they only know fear.
Every day I help convert a few more people away from the faggotry that is being shoved down their throats. It's not even difficult. Most people don't believe any of the nonsense but believe they have to externalize it in order to protect their pathetic livelihood.
Stop eating and drinking worthless empty food and drink, exercise regularly, and do your research. Be the change you want to see in the world.
You aren't looking at jews. You are looking at super WASPs. The great achievement of the American revolution was the recognition of private property as kingdoms. It created a great meritocracy.
The jews have managed to create a group of high IQ individuals with a good cultural background promoting work ethics. They naturally started swimming upwards with nature and nurture firing on all cylinders.
The ones who reached the top assimilimated to the WASP class and adopted their progressive religion. Not quite wholly though, they thought the problem was property rights all together. If ripping power from the king helped them, then surely all the other groups that fail in meritocracies must be kept down the same way they were.
It isn't a hard observation to make. They could look around and see things like Jim Crow. Part of assimilation is that the host adopts beneficial traits. It isn't good, but it is beneficial to ruin everyone around you to keep power. Thus, destructive chaos has accidentally become the religion of the upper class, particularly the German speaking Jews that had recently become super WASPs. People like John Reed started running around destroying the world by handing out bags of Rothschild money to the worst society has to offer.
This brings us to an interesting quirk of WW2. These German Jews looked back at their yiddish speaking bretheren in eastern Europe and saw a stain on their heritage. Hitler saw the problem, but didn't know what it was. He tried to get a reaction from New York by attacking Jews locally. They were happy to see Hitler wiping out the yids. Hence why the New York Times et al actively downplayed the whole affair, until the 70s when the soviet's Nazi boogeyman(race wars leave interesting scars) was adopted by the Cathedral.
Did you know jews were a minor footnote to World War 2? No one cared at the time about the yids getting wiped out.
Hitler Lives was made for the occupation. Notice that they show the camps, but don't use the word Jew once. World War 2 was originally just a race war between Slavs and Germans.
The only reason we got involved is because the USSR was a client state of the US empire. John Reed ran around Moscow with a big bag of Rothschild money to fund Lenin's revolution. Today we call that Civil Affairs and use planes full of money.
Comment Removed: Rule 16: Identity attacks
"You fuckin idiots how can you get me arrested for speaking my mind on twitter? Fuxk you"
Oh boy, looks like Wiley isn't as awake as he thinks he is.
Comment Removed: Rule 16: Identity attacks
Are you denying the accuracy of the information?
With the removal, no.
Personally, sure. I'm willing to bet there's a rhetorical game being played with who the "owner" of a ship is, what a "slave ship" is, and what an "ethnic jew" is, which is all pretty standard fare for racist propaganda.
For example, I'm willing to bet that someone would be counted as the "Jewish owner of a slave ship" if they were a protestant whose maternal grandmother was ethnically Jewish, and this person was the co-owner of a merchant company, that listed a trading ship in it's assets, that would occasionally carry slaves from Africa along with other commodities like gold and ivory. All while this person identified themselves as Spanish or Portuguese, and the company itself was a Spanish or Portuguese company.
Despite the fact that Portuguese and Spanish people really were hugely influential in the slave trade as part of the Portuguese and Spanish Empire's strategic operations, none of them will be ethnically or racially blamed for slavery, showing the hypocrisy of the whole thing.
Even then, there's no reason that the Portuguese or the Spanish should be claimed to be guilty of some sort of crime, because it's abhorrent to try and claim that any ethnicity should be labeled universally guilty of something.
Not to mention that the top quote is that 78% of all Slave owners period were Jews, which doesn't even make sense considering how many slave owners in the US were Anglo or Germanic, how many were Catholic Spanish & Portugese in Latin America, how many were Arab or Turkish Muslim in Northern Africa & Europe, and how many were African in Africa.
Comment Removed: Rule 16: Identity attacks