Rabbi Jonathan Cahn admits: Christianity was created by the Jews as a "Spiritual Weapon against Rome".
One could say that Christianity represents one of the earliest psyops and at the same time one of the most successful and sustainable ones.
Like a Trojan horse, the faith spread throughout the entire Roman Empire, until it eventually became one of the most powerful and influential religions in the world. Over the centuries, it shaped the mindsets, cultures, and social structures of billions of people.
The pagans represented the greatest danger to the Jews, militarily superior, politically dominant, and uncontrollable. So the Jews made them controllable through theological warfare. By accepting Christianity, the pagans automatically adopted the entire Jewish framing and the Abrahamic worldview. The once uncontrollable enemy suddenly thought in the same categories as his former enemies. It's no coincidence that it's called Judeo-Christian, meaning Jewish-Christian.
Thus, the Jews succeeded through theological-psychological warfare in converting large parts of the pagan world to a belief system whose roots lie deep in the Jewish context. They ultimately managed to get the Romans, who were their greatest enemies and pagans, to convert to a faith that served them and their agenda. The control was not achieved through weapons, but through the adoption of the Jewish worldview, and precisely because of this, the pagans, who once represented the greatest threat, became predictable, malleable, and controllable.
I can see the idea here, i'm just not completely sold on it. I've seen an opinion that original christianity that was pushed on the romans was quite jewish and subversive and then things got out of hand for the heebs because europeans started merging christianity and paganism. The protestant movement then was used as a wedge to split the christians further and then 20th century was the final nail in the coffin. I don't really see the logic here because if christianity was a subversive tool from the start, then why bother eradicating it? And if it was a failed experiment then what about islam?
My old username was RaceCreatesCulture for a reason. Jews created Christianity and used it to subvert Rome but Whites made it their own. Which meant for centuries, the way Christianity became shaped came from White people not jews because Whites took control of it. The Romans handled the subversion as best they could. They created the Catholic Church to take control of Christianity then allowed it to finish it's subversion but entirely under Rome's control. For centuries, Whites kept the true understanding of Christianity under check which is why only priests could teach it and read it while the peasants couldn't. We're taught religion was used by the establishment to control us because of this lack of understanding and segment between priests and peasantry but actually, originally, it was done to protect the peasants from Christianity. For centuries, White people shaped Christianity to suit their genetics, hence the RCC. Protestants removed this shaping by ignoring all Catholic interpretation to literally interpret the Bible (and a Bible where the old testament is entirely judaised). Jews love evangelicals and all the Christians that fully interpret the Bible exactly/literally. The "old Christianity" that everyone here clings onto is a Christianity shaped for White people's interests without literally interpretating the Bible. It's never coming back because it was just an eventually delay of where we're at now. Any new religion for White people must not be Christian anymore.
Rabbi Jonathan Cahn admits: Christianity was created by the Jews as a "Spiritual Weapon against Rome".
One could say that Christianity represents one of the earliest psyops and at the same time one of the most successful and sustainable ones.
Like a Trojan horse, the faith spread throughout the entire Roman Empire, until it eventually became one of the most powerful and influential religions in the world. Over the centuries, it shaped the mindsets, cultures, and social structures of billions of people.
The pagans represented the greatest danger to the Jews, militarily superior, politically dominant, and uncontrollable. So the Jews made them controllable through theological warfare. By accepting Christianity, the pagans automatically adopted the entire Jewish framing and the Abrahamic worldview. The once uncontrollable enemy suddenly thought in the same categories as his former enemies. It's no coincidence that it's called Judeo-Christian, meaning Jewish-Christian.
Thus, the Jews succeeded through theological-psychological warfare in converting large parts of the pagan world to a belief system whose roots lie deep in the Jewish context. They ultimately managed to get the Romans, who were their greatest enemies and pagans, to convert to a faith that served them and their agenda. The control was not achieved through weapons, but through the adoption of the Jewish worldview, and precisely because of this, the pagans, who once represented the greatest threat, became predictable, malleable, and controllable.
I can see the idea here, i'm just not completely sold on it. I've seen an opinion that original christianity that was pushed on the romans was quite jewish and subversive and then things got out of hand for the heebs because europeans started merging christianity and paganism. The protestant movement then was used as a wedge to split the christians further and then 20th century was the final nail in the coffin. I don't really see the logic here because if christianity was a subversive tool from the start, then why bother eradicating it? And if it was a failed experiment then what about islam?
My old username was RaceCreatesCulture for a reason. Jews created Christianity and used it to subvert Rome but Whites made it their own. Which meant for centuries, the way Christianity became shaped came from White people not jews because Whites took control of it. The Romans handled the subversion as best they could. They created the Catholic Church to take control of Christianity then allowed it to finish it's subversion but entirely under Rome's control. For centuries, Whites kept the true understanding of Christianity under check which is why only priests could teach it and read it while the peasants couldn't. We're taught religion was used by the establishment to control us because of this lack of understanding and segment between priests and peasantry but actually, originally, it was done to protect the peasants from Christianity. For centuries, White people shaped Christianity to suit their genetics, hence the RCC. Protestants removed this shaping by ignoring all Catholic interpretation to literally interpret the Bible (and a Bible where the old testament is entirely judaised). Jews love evangelicals and all the Christians that fully interpret the Bible exactly/literally. The "old Christianity" that everyone here clings onto is a Christianity shaped for White people's interests without literally interpretating the Bible. It's never coming back because it was just an eventually delay of where we're at now. Any new religion for White people must not be Christian anymore.