It is now proven almost beyond the shadow of a doubt that Charlie Kirk was not wearing any body armor. The attending sheriff, Erika Kirk, dozens of photographs showing the outline of his pectoral muscles and nipples, and front row witness statements all concur that he was just wearing a t-shirt.
The idea that he was wearing body armor was based on a few frames of Charlie's t-shirt jerking up, and a good faith attempt to make the FBI story make sense. But the most credible proponent of that theory, Paramount Tactical, admitted (before statements from Erika Kirk etc) that there was already a "90% chance Charlie wasn't wearing body armor."
For their part, Turning Point USA's version of the story, and the FBI's, do not mention body armor at all. The official version of the story is that the bullet didn't exit and was trapped under the skin of Charlie's back.
So what are we left with? The officially blamed weapon is a Mauser 98 firing a 30-06 round over less than 200 yards. A typical 30-06 round has a muzzle energy of 2,500-3,000 ft-lbs. That's enough to shoot through solid buckets of ice, cow bones, steel plate, and bear skulls. Conclusion: there is no way that a 30-06 round shot Charlie in the neck and did not exit.
The official story is provably false. So what really happened?
edit: Paramount also threw cold water on the idea of a frangible 30-06 round.
We’d need to control the investigation to have proof that the entire narrative is nonsense, and that’s never gonna happen. The problem is, the goycattle as a majority swallow whatever narrative they are fed by the system, so it wouldn’t even matter if we had hard evidence that the entire narrative is horseshit because the majority still wouldn’t believe us. We called out numerous outright lies during the Covid 19 psyop, we called out the lies surrounding the Vegas mass shooting, and it didn’t change anything, the lockdowns and public health orders continued for 2 years, the Vegas mass shooting led to the bumpstock ban, the coverups were successful in both cases and the masses just went along with whatever they were told. I do suspect Israel played a leading role in the hit, but I’ll never be able to truly prove it, and their narrative has already been swallowed by the masses so the damage has already been done in the way they wanted it done so far, all we can do is try to mitigate any further damage in the form of anti-terror laws that will no doubt be directed at the right, even though it will certainly be sold to us like it’s about targeting antifa.
I'm heartbroken for a young man whose life is being destroyed by what is obviously a professional hit.