I mean perspective wise because of HOW wealthy he is, this would be like us giving $1 to impregnate a 7/10.
Which given the current state of western women, I'm finding it hard to justify WHY this is a 'bad thing' as women have been OPENLY treating relationships with men as materialistic, why shouldn't men so the same as just paying for the womb?
I mean perspective wise because of HOW wealthy he is, this would be like us giving $1 to impregnate a 7/10.
Which given the current state of western women, I'm finding it hard to justify WHY this is a 'bad thing' as women have been OPENLY treating relationships with men as materialistic, why shouldn't men so the same as just paying for the womb?
This math assumes you’re worth $15million!
And that's STILL a closer grasp of reality on this deal than most of the media, whether would you put the number as?