Yeah, that probably is not a thing, otherwise they'd be doing it recreationally too.
If you think instincts are perfect prebaked answers to every specific situation then you're obviously going to be confused like that.
It's more like the outcome of the balance of "caring more about the innocent dog's entire life and existence vs my brief personal inconvenience" instincts.
For all we know she might have a history of being abusive. Obviously sub 90 IQ, but a sub 90 IQ is way more likely to just leave the dog at the airport and not think further than that.
If you're too dumb to think to check if you can just take a dog on a flight unannounced, then you're too dumb to do moral calculus.
If you're too dumb to do moral calculus then you can only go off instinct when you don't have a cultural script to lean on, and instincts are genetic.
I'm not entirely sure about the "drown the dog in the airport bathroom" instinct.
THEY'RE DROWNING THE DAAWGIZ, THEY'RE DROWNING THE CATS...
Yeah, that probably is not a thing, otherwise they'd be doing it recreationally too.
If you think instincts are perfect prebaked answers to every specific situation then you're obviously going to be confused like that.
It's more like the outcome of the balance of "caring more about the innocent dog's entire life and existence vs my brief personal inconvenience" instincts.
For all we know she might have a history of being abusive. Obviously sub 90 IQ, but a sub 90 IQ is way more likely to just leave the dog at the airport and not think further than that.
GgggURggllle GGGUrRGlLe