I know you weren't OP, but I thank you for the clarification.
Is the link between the subscription service Tesla DRM software and the Dogequest dox site in this story the assumption that the DRM subscriber data was the source of the hack?
The article offers no clue about the source of the information; the Dogequest site seems like an attack against Tesla across the board, from charging & sales locations to individual owners.
I'm strongly against paying a subscription to get what should be sold as a complete product. The hack is more or less incidental to me.
So DRM just like anti-piracy software for video games?
Yep. All the hardware is in the car, but you pay a subscription (or fee) to activate your heated seats, auto-drive, extra battery capacity, etc.
I know you weren't OP, but I thank you for the clarification.
Is the link between the subscription service Tesla DRM software and the Dogequest dox site in this story the assumption that the DRM subscriber data was the source of the hack?
The article offers no clue about the source of the information; the Dogequest site seems like an attack against Tesla across the board, from charging & sales locations to individual owners.
I'm strongly against paying a subscription to get what should be sold as a complete product. The hack is more or less incidental to me.