BBC - "Trump moves to close down Voice of America"
(archive.fo)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (15)
sorted by:
I suppose it says they should probably become profitable rather than depending on tax dollars to keep them afloat.
How can government funded media be considered "free" to begin with
Here's the issue: how can privately-funded mainstream media remain profitable? We're no longer in an era where everyone tunes in to a specific channel for "unbiased" coverage. They've all proven to be corrupt and catering to special interests, like the government, or in its absence, rich donators like Soros and other billionaires with an agenda. They can't make a profit and maintain standards purely on commercials, since fewer people than ever actually watch tv, and most people have ways to avoid watching ads with streaming.
So how else are they supposed to stay afloat and with good standards? You can't run a network like Fox or CNN with the OMG's funding.
It's not up to us to figure out how to fix their dying business model.
Move to more "subtle" (hah) product placement, like how many news stations will have cutesy puff pieces about medical wonders of pharmaceuticals whenever Pfizer buys ad space. And then scale down operations and shift focii.