They are both called "pedos" according to these zealots and according to laws like the ones that Texas is trying to push, and that they are increasingly trying to make this opinion in to law by giving anime characters the same human rights as real people. .
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (173)
sorted by:
I'm a simple man who follow these rules:
If yes to either or both, then you are a pedo and should be locked up.
And anime drawings are not either of these things .
And said anime drawings are voice acted by adults.
Where I do draw the line is if the fictional characters are depicted realistically.
Have you seen what actual loli shit looks like? It's literally just drawn child porn man, it's gross
I have and loli is:
Now why did I say that I draw the line if fictional characters are depicted realistically? Because they are depicted in real body and facial proportions, i.e. they resemble very closely to real humans.
I can differentiate between what's real and what's not. Apparently for you...
It can easily lead to the consumption of real CP or molesting children. It's sexualizing children. Why do you find children attractive? What's to stop someone who finds lolis attractive from graduating to the real thing?
Rather than hypothetic scenario, you need to supply with actual proof. By now we have tons of data and evidence that backs up your claim, right? What you are implying is you are ok with criminalising a thought crime and that's going to open so many doors to more censoring.
So what you're saying is to ban violent video games because what's to stop someone who finds FPS fun from shooting up a Walmart?
Different things are different.
I've said like ten times in this thread that entertainment and video games aren't the same thing as sexual desire. It's like being attracted to drawings of little girls makes you guys unable to read or something