Its worse than racist, because you can be a proud racist and a lot of people will cheer for you. The pendulum can swing back on that and make it normal.
No one will be open or proud pedos, its against our very instincts. We will always hate them, and even those who are proud of being one only do so because it makes them feel evil and edgy.
keep accusations for things restricted to those who actually qualify for those things
People are using pedo, the attraction to prepubescence, to apply to teenagers all the way to young adult women. Its not meant to have a qualification, its just meant to be an I Win Button to destroy someone. There are 90 good reasons why you shouldn't legally or morally be attracted to teenagers, but that's too complicated so its easier to say "pedo" to evoke images of children instead of 5'6 girls with mostly developed bodies.
A retarded giga-nigga on this very forum has been arguing with me for like 10 days now that because Trump knew Epstein, they are both baby raping monsters. And he is sure to say "BABY RAPER" over and over.
When Epstein's youngest known victim is 11. Still bad, still evil, still should be given no difference in treatment. But the argument is coming from a place of pure emotion, and is attempting to use the same emotional argument that worked on them. And cannot understand why it isn't working, so clearly you must be evil too!
People are using pedo, the attraction to prepubescence, to apply to teenagers all the way to young adult women. Its not meant to have a qualification, its just meant to be an I Win Button to destroy someone.
Something I've always found really interesting is that the life cycle of a woman can basically be broken down into three phases. 0-14/15ish, 15-25 or 30, and 25/30+. Basically childhood, prime years, and post wall years. The exact ages aren't set in stone, but that's the rough framework. For literally all of recorded human civilization, it was understood that the 15-25/30 year period was the peak for a woman, and that a man marrying her had about that amount of time to marry, have as many kids as possible, and because he had enjoyed her during those prime years and was her first in basically everything, they had a bond that would last for decades, well past when she stopped being 'hot'.
So out of those 3 phases, 1 of them is the one where it was always normal and expected for a man to be attracted to a woman, and the other two; childhood and post-wall (or spinster as they called it), were the phases that were not considered normal for a man to be looking for a wife. Mohammedan savages excluded of course, Christendom at least understood that actual pedophilia was evil, and a woman who had not gotten a husband by the time she as in her late 20s to 30s clearly had something wrong with her.
What are the two phases that the left is actively encouraging people to be attracted to now though? Childhood and post-wall. What is the one phase where they will attack you if you're attracted to a woman in that phase? Her prime. They will simultaneously defend and make excuses for degenerates who are sexually attracted to an 8yo, and then immediately turn around and call the 22yo guy who thinks the 16yo he saw on the beach in a bikini is hot a pedo. To the point where they even call any man in his 30s who is attracted to even an 18 legal adult a pedo.
Pure satanic inversion. Call that which is good and normal evil, and call that which is vile and abnormal good.
"call the 22yo guy who thinks the 16yo he saw on the beach in a bikini is hot a pedo. To the point where they even call any man in his 30s who is attracted to even an 18 legal adult a pedo."
And they won't take into account when, not if, the 18-year-old "girl" has been whoring around for years (hopefully no more than a few years, preferably two if there must be an "s" at the end of "years") but the guy is a kissless virgin who needed to work on becoming good husband material first by making money (that women have multiple options of not making, first, in order to find a decent man).
Most 18-year-old American guys shouldn't be having sex, unless they somehow have lots of money or resources at such a young age. This is precisely why a 30-year-old guy is entitled to a much younger woman; most women his own age are already married, or are whores*, or are divorced, and generally are not mother material. It makes sense if a guy is a 30-year-old virgin: modern women's standards are idiotic and delusional. If a woman is 30 years old and a virgin she generally deserves less sympathy, as she will almost never be called a creep or accused of "harassing" a "poor guy" with her "creepiness".
And enough of shaming a 22 year old guy for losing his virginity to an 18-year-old high school senior graduating in a few months with the "she's still in high school!" nonsense. Like graduating from government-enforced indoctrination camps at at 12th grade is some rite of passage that officially makes young women competent for sex, and she's a few months away from being qualified for your virgin 22-year old ass.
ASTERISK section:
*If you had sex outside of marriage once, or at least not in a very committed relationship, you are a whore/slut, and I say the same of any man.
The reason why "slut-shaming" is seen as a thing that is mistreating women, and not men, why it is a "double standard", is because women are the upholders of that double standard, Women and the small amount of men who are successfully promiscuous.
It is primarily some women who are okay with men being sluts, until it directly affects them. Until their hot boytoy who they delusionally believe is their exclusive partner, goes and fucks a younger woman.
Any man who is not a womanizer alpha male "Chad", who then celebrates such male promiscuity being done with lots of women, is a cuck.
Its worse than racist, because you can be a proud racist and a lot of people will cheer for you. The pendulum can swing back on that and make it normal.
No one will be open or proud pedos, its against our very instincts. We will always hate them, and even those who are proud of being one only do so because it makes them feel evil and edgy.
People are using pedo, the attraction to prepubescence, to apply to teenagers all the way to young adult women. Its not meant to have a qualification, its just meant to be an I Win Button to destroy someone. There are 90 good reasons why you shouldn't legally or morally be attracted to teenagers, but that's too complicated so its easier to say "pedo" to evoke images of children instead of 5'6 girls with mostly developed bodies.
A retarded giga-nigga on this very forum has been arguing with me for like 10 days now that because Trump knew Epstein, they are both baby raping monsters. And he is sure to say "BABY RAPER" over and over.
When Epstein's youngest known victim is 11. Still bad, still evil, still should be given no difference in treatment. But the argument is coming from a place of pure emotion, and is attempting to use the same emotional argument that worked on them. And cannot understand why it isn't working, so clearly you must be evil too!
Something I've always found really interesting is that the life cycle of a woman can basically be broken down into three phases. 0-14/15ish, 15-25 or 30, and 25/30+. Basically childhood, prime years, and post wall years. The exact ages aren't set in stone, but that's the rough framework. For literally all of recorded human civilization, it was understood that the 15-25/30 year period was the peak for a woman, and that a man marrying her had about that amount of time to marry, have as many kids as possible, and because he had enjoyed her during those prime years and was her first in basically everything, they had a bond that would last for decades, well past when she stopped being 'hot'.
So out of those 3 phases, 1 of them is the one where it was always normal and expected for a man to be attracted to a woman, and the other two; childhood and post-wall (or spinster as they called it), were the phases that were not considered normal for a man to be looking for a wife. Mohammedan savages excluded of course, Christendom at least understood that actual pedophilia was evil, and a woman who had not gotten a husband by the time she as in her late 20s to 30s clearly had something wrong with her.
What are the two phases that the left is actively encouraging people to be attracted to now though? Childhood and post-wall. What is the one phase where they will attack you if you're attracted to a woman in that phase? Her prime. They will simultaneously defend and make excuses for degenerates who are sexually attracted to an 8yo, and then immediately turn around and call the 22yo guy who thinks the 16yo he saw on the beach in a bikini is hot a pedo. To the point where they even call any man in his 30s who is attracted to even an 18 legal adult a pedo.
Pure satanic inversion. Call that which is good and normal evil, and call that which is vile and abnormal good.
"call the 22yo guy who thinks the 16yo he saw on the beach in a bikini is hot a pedo. To the point where they even call any man in his 30s who is attracted to even an 18 legal adult a pedo."
And they won't take into account when, not if, the 18-year-old "girl" has been whoring around for years (hopefully no more than a few years, preferably two if there must be an "s" at the end of "years") but the guy is a kissless virgin who needed to work on becoming good husband material first by making money (that women have multiple options of not making, first, in order to find a decent man).
Most 18-year-old American guys shouldn't be having sex, unless they somehow have lots of money or resources at such a young age. This is precisely why a 30-year-old guy is entitled to a much younger woman; most women his own age are already married, or are whores*, or are divorced, and generally are not mother material. It makes sense if a guy is a 30-year-old virgin: modern women's standards are idiotic and delusional. If a woman is 30 years old and a virgin she generally deserves less sympathy, as she will almost never be called a creep or accused of "harassing" a "poor guy" with her "creepiness".
And enough of shaming a 22 year old guy for losing his virginity to an 18-year-old high school senior graduating in a few months with the "she's still in high school!" nonsense. Like graduating from government-enforced indoctrination camps at at 12th grade is some rite of passage that officially makes young women competent for sex, and she's a few months away from being qualified for your virgin 22-year old ass.
ASTERISK section: *If you had sex outside of marriage once, or at least not in a very committed relationship, you are a whore/slut, and I say the same of any man.
The reason why "slut-shaming" is seen as a thing that is mistreating women, and not men, why it is a "double standard", is because women are the upholders of that double standard, Women and the small amount of men who are successfully promiscuous.
It is primarily some women who are okay with men being sluts, until it directly affects them. Until their hot boytoy who they delusionally believe is their exclusive partner, goes and fucks a younger woman.
Any man who is not a womanizer alpha male "Chad", who then celebrates such male promiscuity being done with lots of women, is a cuck.