That's what it always meant.

I have no idea if he's a Jew but it's funny how these types, whether liberal, Zionist or simple BS artist, will without fail hold up a strawman stereotype as a totem representing their hegelian enemy to score easy points on. James is one of those twitter twits who famously does not debate anyone seriously online, and freely blockchains anyone who might post a legit counter argument. (Sargon for example) But here we see the guy he chooses to reply to makes an arguably positive comment about Hitler so obviously James thinks he's making a clever point about Nazism that goes beyond the literal Epstein topic, which he feels no need to address. To James, shining a spotlight on this user who may or may not like Hitler is such a slam dunk he doesn't even see how foolish it makes him look

Reminds me of Vavra in the whole KCD2 woke controversy. He was entirely silent and refused to answer any and all questions or suspicions about it until a literal Black Sun flag profile pic challenged him - and THATS guy he chose to reply to and mic drop about antisemites. For all I know the "nazi" he replied to was his own alt. They cry out in pain as they strike you.

Safe, stable, homogenous, high trust communities by and for ethnic White European Christians?

NEVER AGAIN!