I thought KCD looked like a boring game back in the day that only got any praise because it "clapped back against the SJWs" and rode that easy train to popularity.
So I can't be disappointed in a game I had no interest in and already thought was a grifter.
It was anything but boring, but it is sure as hell was unfinished (hell there wasn't even blacksmithing features and crossbows were missing)
It was almost like a hige beta, the things they got right was the immersion and the graphics, soundtrack and quest design (its like Gothic basically, quests can be completed before they are even started)
It was a solid game with ZERO niggers, which is why i held it to high regard despite the missing features
As for Vavra, i had massive respect for the lad until he sold out the very company he co-founded for a bag of shekels (he's a jew so obviously shekels were dearer to him than actually staying true to his vision)
While I understand why people hold this in high regard as a standard, its also not enough to sell something to me. Its a great baseline, a selling point to get me to look into your game, but I'm not going to plunge just for it.
As such, I passed on KCD because that's all it was really selling itself on at the time, the historical accuracy. Otherwise it looked boring to me and I've seen nothing since to change that opinion.
But that's just to me and I understand people might love it instead, no hate. Gothic is a great comparison because that's how I felt about that one too. However, I wasn't going to play this one either because of that so I won't be disappointed either way.
You are free to ask the devs yourself
Though you should brace for disappointment
I thought KCD looked like a boring game back in the day that only got any praise because it "clapped back against the SJWs" and rode that easy train to popularity.
So I can't be disappointed in a game I had no interest in and already thought was a grifter.
It was anything but boring, but it is sure as hell was unfinished (hell there wasn't even blacksmithing features and crossbows were missing)
It was almost like a hige beta, the things they got right was the immersion and the graphics, soundtrack and quest design (its like Gothic basically, quests can be completed before they are even started)
It was a solid game with ZERO niggers, which is why i held it to high regard despite the missing features
As for Vavra, i had massive respect for the lad until he sold out the very company he co-founded for a bag of shekels (he's a jew so obviously shekels were dearer to him than actually staying true to his vision)
While I understand why people hold this in high regard as a standard, its also not enough to sell something to me. Its a great baseline, a selling point to get me to look into your game, but I'm not going to plunge just for it.
As such, I passed on KCD because that's all it was really selling itself on at the time, the historical accuracy. Otherwise it looked boring to me and I've seen nothing since to change that opinion.
But that's just to me and I understand people might love it instead, no hate. Gothic is a great comparison because that's how I felt about that one too. However, I wasn't going to play this one either because of that so I won't be disappointed either way.