Foster Parents shot for fostering child
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (105)
sorted by:
A plot so fucking heinous and awful that only a nigger could possibly think it up.
But also a grim reminder that you are not Jesus and cannot save everyone through sheer goodness of intentions. These people tried to save a little nog baby and managed to get themselves killed and ruined their own child's life by doing so. They reached a hand into the mud to help and pulled their entire bloodline into hell by doing so.
So the solution is what, kill the children along with the mother?
You think that this psychotic mother wouldn't have engaged in an identical level of violence if it were black family that adopted her abused and abandoned children?
Or perhaps the children should be raised by the street? Oh wait, that's already the situation with lot's of black kids as it is.
And what of Jeffrey Bernhard? Fuck him and is dead wife, he shouldn't have those kids, just as the killer said, right? Take his children away from him, and make sure those kids grow up fatherless so that no one will love them, right?
Here, go to their GoFundMe and tell them they deserved to get shot for raising black kids.
Get a fucking grip, man.
Yes.jpg
I guarantee that a component of this is her antipathy towards White people.
"Black on black crime doesn't real"
Either the violence is genetic and they would have done it to everyone, or the violence is purely ideological and they discriminate on their victims. It can't be both. (It's actually neither, but you all are the people who set up the false dichotomy anyway)
Huh? It definitely can be. Without necessarily talking about any particular groups, it’s easy to see how that could work: Imagine a hypothetical genetic effect that makes someone more prone to any combination of things like anger, paranoia, violence, and/or impulsive actions, and then imagine they adopt an ideology that tells them a certain group of people are bad and responsible for bad things in that person’s life. The genetic component gives them the wherewithal, the ideology gives the target.
Alternatively, imagine someone prone to violence who adopts an ideology that tells them a certain group of people are their kinsmen/friends/allies. Would they not be more likely to control themselves around that group of people?
Of course it can be both, you
dimwitmidwit. They commit violence upon one another due to proximity and a general lack of self-control over a long period of time, but are occasionally able to act to an agenda in the short term. That you can't see both as being possible is a fault in your mental faculties, not the premise.This comment is terrible. Yes two things can be true at once. Blacks are violent, and they direct it at whites on purpose.