WW2 was huge, they seriously couldn't have found anything besides a story about damn mailmen?
If they wanted to tell stories from different perspectives during ww2, they'd be better off making a movie about the North African campaign or the Japanese invasion of SE Asia. Plenty of non Whites fought in both those theaters, especially for the latter.
Hell, look up Lieutenant Adnan who served in British Malaya against the Japanese. I'm sure his last stand would make for a great movie if done right.
But who am I kidding, these studios only want to tell stories that they can twist into going "look, evil whitey".
In a completely neutral setting, this is a decent idea just because its unique while being tied to something bigger. We have a lot of WW2 war movies that cover nearly every genre that have been done better than they ever could, so making that would just be pissing in the ocean. This could at least raise an eyebrow at first glance and that's huge in terms of marketing.
But we know its not a neutral decision and was chosen specifically because of the black and women portion, if that even actually happened, and is going to entirely be some nonsense anti-racism story where black women somehow suffered worse than the men getting shot at.
But we know its not a neutral decision and was chosen specifically because of the black and women portion, if that even actually happened
And, furthermore, if it actually happened, I no longer believe these people to tell the truth about anything, so I'm assuming that this story specifically did not happen.
So their attempt to expose us to 'history,' if it is in fact history, has me making the assumption that they couldn't find anything worth writing about if this was the lie they had to tell.
If a woman claims a guy raped/abused her? I now 100% assume she is trying to manipulate me and/or destroy him, and he now has my support. And it takes considerable evidence to change that.
Any form of "bigotry?" You are either making it up or did something to deserve it.
On and on. In all of these various discussions, they've made me just reject anything they say outright and need a preponderances of evidence to shake that.
And don't forget "We did/invented X" really means that they had a non-essential role that could have been performed by any Tom, Dick, or Harry off the street.
WW2 was huge, they seriously couldn't have found anything besides a story about damn mailmen?
If they wanted to tell stories from different perspectives during ww2, they'd be better off making a movie about the North African campaign or the Japanese invasion of SE Asia. Plenty of non Whites fought in both those theaters, especially for the latter.
Hell, look up Lieutenant Adnan who served in British Malaya against the Japanese. I'm sure his last stand would make for a great movie if done right.
But who am I kidding, these studios only want to tell stories that they can twist into going "look, evil whitey".
In a completely neutral setting, this is a decent idea just because its unique while being tied to something bigger. We have a lot of WW2 war movies that cover nearly every genre that have been done better than they ever could, so making that would just be pissing in the ocean. This could at least raise an eyebrow at first glance and that's huge in terms of marketing.
But we know its not a neutral decision and was chosen specifically because of the black and women portion, if that even actually happened, and is going to entirely be some nonsense anti-racism story where black women somehow suffered worse than the men getting shot at.
And, furthermore, if it actually happened, I no longer believe these people to tell the truth about anything, so I'm assuming that this story specifically did not happen.
So their attempt to expose us to 'history,' if it is in fact history, has me making the assumption that they couldn't find anything worth writing about if this was the lie they had to tell.
That's how I feel about most "claims" now.
If a woman claims a guy raped/abused her? I now 100% assume she is trying to manipulate me and/or destroy him, and he now has my support. And it takes considerable evidence to change that.
Any form of "bigotry?" You are either making it up or did something to deserve it.
On and on. In all of these various discussions, they've made me just reject anything they say outright and need a preponderances of evidence to shake that.
And don't forget "We did/invented X" really means that they had a non-essential role that could have been performed by any Tom, Dick, or Harry off the street.
With respect to naggers, if I may say that, complaining is endless. I call bullshit on all of it. They are looking for a payout. Esp. the lawyers.