You keep asserting that "everyone else has", but that's not an argument I agree with, and more importantly it's still a self-asserting argument: you want race-based policies so you embrace a race-based world view.
I want no race based policies, which is why I don't want a race based world view. We're not playing the same game, in fact, I'm not playing the game at all. Mostly because I know it's just a con for someone else to claim authority over a group and steal my shit for "what's best for me".
You keep asserting that "everyone else has", but that's not an argument I agree with, and more importantly it's still a self-asserting argument: you want race-based policies so you embrace a race-based world view.
I want no race based policies, which is why I don't want a race based world view. We're not playing the same game, in fact, I'm not playing the game at all. Mostly because I know it's just a con for someone else to claim authority over a group and steal my shit for "what's best for me".
Afterall, it's what BLM already did.
You're the one who proposed the following policy:
I really wish you would just acknowledge reality as a baseline before you start espousing idealism that is utterly divorced from it.
That's not a race based policy. I don't want anyone discriminated against racially.
The baseline reality is acknowledging that humans are capable of living in the US as Americans so long as they are willing to do so.
That is race based policy. You are not living in reality.
It's a universal policy. Those are not the same.