I've heard France doesn't require them because they feel they harm the child, it's better that the dude gets butt fucked rather than find out and refuse service to the child.
I imagine US courts feel similarly about it, they just don't announce it as policy. Personally it seems to endanger the child to not have him aware of possible genetic issues, familial heritage, or possible family members.
Pretty much. A lot of states in the US have it where if a child is born in wedlock the kid automatically counts as the child of the husband even if there is direct evidence to the contrary because it "protects the child by keeping families together"
Their only argument against it is literally:
Which any grown adult knows is the exact line that someone cheating or lying uses immediately.
I've heard France doesn't require them because they feel they harm the child, it's better that the dude gets butt fucked rather than find out and refuse service to the child.
I imagine US courts feel similarly about it, they just don't announce it as policy. Personally it seems to endanger the child to not have him aware of possible genetic issues, familial heritage, or possible family members.
But hey women need to be protected at all cost.
Pretty much. A lot of states in the US have it where if a child is born in wedlock the kid automatically counts as the child of the husband even if there is direct evidence to the contrary because it "protects the child by keeping families together"