Basically the title.
I'm seeing people praising this Luigi dude. However, I cannot think of a time in history when it became popular to advocate murdering people in the streets that wasn't followed by leftists committing mass atrocities.
All I have seen is an increase in advocacy for murdering white men, right wing ceos, our future president, and anyone seen as wealthy.
I am struggling to see how anyone is reconciling being right wing with the complete disorder and moral failing that murdering random people in the street would involve.
This isn't some issue that is bridging the gap with the left. They want you dead too. They will celebrate your death as well.
This is an example why I think we will never ultimately win because the right is so quick to adopt the ideas of the left.
So please give me an example in history where this hasn't led to bad examples.
To further illustrate my point. Look at the difference in media coverage. We know more about Luigi than the Nashville shooter or Crookes and one murdered a bunch of children and the other shot the president.
Yet we know Luigis social media, his goals and motivation, his childhood and every single picture meant to make him look cool.
Yes. That's all very well established. My sole point since the beginning is that suffering does not create profits and that means "that directly profits off of human misery" is inaccurate and a low-effort talking point.
Personal injury lawyer? Can't profit without the injury. They go out of business if there is no misery.
Health insurance? Can profit without the illness. They can stay in business with only the worry of potential misery.
I don't understand how people see words on a screen that say, "this canned line deliberately taints discussion" and read it as "I love everything about insurance companies, they do no wrong. They're all the best and are totally ethical!" It's possible to nitpick rhetoric without being the enemy team.
Problem is, your nitpick is insubstantial. You would have a point if people here decried the entire concept of health insurance, but they're not.