Without looking at the article I figured it was one of the trifecta (lgbt/black/female). No surprise. This is similar to how they are very accurate in historical pieces when someone was gay (or even rumored to have been). I have some of the Cross Patterson books and they weren’t bad. My friend tried watching the Prime show and said he turned it off because it got into race stuff.
"Duty" is something people don't understand anymore. The story of Mulan was basically the same sort of thing- they felt a duty to God/family to take up arms and join the army, at time periods when women doing ANYTHING outside of homebuilding was unheard of. No shit they tried to make themselves look like men.
I shudder at what modern libs might be saying about d'Eon de Beaumont.
Without looking at the article I figured it was one of the trifecta (lgbt/black/female). No surprise. This is similar to how they are very accurate in historical pieces when someone was gay (or even rumored to have been). I have some of the Cross Patterson books and they weren’t bad. My friend tried watching the Prime show and said he turned it off because it got into race stuff.
They portray Joan of Arc as "gender non-conforming", which is a crime against humanity.
"Duty" is something people don't understand anymore. The story of Mulan was basically the same sort of thing- they felt a duty to God/family to take up arms and join the army, at time periods when women doing ANYTHING outside of homebuilding was unheard of. No shit they tried to make themselves look like men.
I shudder at what modern libs might be saying about d'Eon de Beaumont.
How do they explain the zealous Catholicism and the name "Maid of Orleans?"
The same thing they explain all other contradictions: ignore them.
Yep, but it’s what I expect. These morons are incapable of simply adapting a story. They have to put their spin on everything