Although some of that could just be that the story was blown out of proportion to begin with, so people were prescribing a lot more competence to the shooter than was actually merited.
I thought from the start this was merely...baseline competence. More than we've seen from some losers, and he gets credit for not immediately running after the shots (thus drawing immediate attention), but he brought a gun to the assassination that didn't even cycle.
So, yeah, some of the confusion could just be that people were expecting some elite assassin, when it could (emphasis on could, we still don't know the full story) just be some random retard.
I don't think professional assassins are anywhere near as capable as people think they are. I have no proof of this, of course, but I suspect it's mostly Hollywood glamorization. Just think of how competent they made secret agents, and then compare that to the clowns we have running the intel agencies.
True, I should have specified. I meant that Hollywood brand of professional assassin.
The only real life requirement to be a "professional assassin" is to be unscrupulous or otherwise twisted enough to accept payment to attempt to kill someone. It might be a somewhat rare breed, but that doesn't mean it's exactly a high bar. You have to crawl under a low bar to be a professional assassin, not leap some elite hurdle.
Point is, people were heaping all sorts of perceived competence on this guy that he probably didn't deserve. At least, that's one explanation.
Cops always say that if you're a normie who isn't in the system for anything over a traffic infraction, go to another state, kill someone you have no connection to whatsoever, and never tell anyone about it, they won't be able to catch you.
Most people aren't psychotic enough to be able to keep that kind of shit to themselves.
Why did he not flee the country? I dont understand this at all.
Yeah, there's a lot that doesn't add up here.
Although some of that could just be that the story was blown out of proportion to begin with, so people were prescribing a lot more competence to the shooter than was actually merited.
I thought from the start this was merely...baseline competence. More than we've seen from some losers, and he gets credit for not immediately running after the shots (thus drawing immediate attention), but he brought a gun to the assassination that didn't even cycle.
So, yeah, some of the confusion could just be that people were expecting some elite assassin, when it could (emphasis on could, we still don't know the full story) just be some random retard.
I don't think professional assassins are anywhere near as capable as people think they are. I have no proof of this, of course, but I suspect it's mostly Hollywood glamorization. Just think of how competent they made secret agents, and then compare that to the clowns we have running the intel agencies.
True, I should have specified. I meant that Hollywood brand of professional assassin.
The only real life requirement to be a "professional assassin" is to be unscrupulous or otherwise twisted enough to accept payment to attempt to kill someone. It might be a somewhat rare breed, but that doesn't mean it's exactly a high bar. You have to crawl under a low bar to be a professional assassin, not leap some elite hurdle.
Point is, people were heaping all sorts of perceived competence on this guy that he probably didn't deserve. At least, that's one explanation.
Cops always say that if you're a normie who isn't in the system for anything over a traffic infraction, go to another state, kill someone you have no connection to whatsoever, and never tell anyone about it, they won't be able to catch you.
Most people aren't psychotic enough to be able to keep that kind of shit to themselves.