Like the original Star Wars trilogy, Indiana Jones, etc.
35mm is the standard for films. I wonder what all of the classic films would look like if 70mm was the standard.
I get its prohibitively expensive which is why it's rare for a film to do it.
It's just fun to imagine if 70mm was the standard used by basically every film.
That's just because people are used to it. I've seen comparison between 24 and 60 FPS movies, and since I don't watch many movies at all, and play games at 144+FPS, I always prefer the 60FPS movie version. To me that feels way more natural.
Furthermore, frames in movies generally have tons of motion blur, it's easily to see if you pause it and look at it frame by frame, none of them are very clean, since they are purposefully built for movements. If your 60FPS version isn't building with the same intent, then yes, the feel is going to be very different.
Also our eyes see constant motions. There's no FPS for the brain. A game running at 144Hz for instance will always look smoother than its 60Hz counter-part.
This is the case against 60 fps movies. The last thing I want is for my movies to be more like my games.
Higher fps IS more natural - exactly why I reject it.