Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

59
"My people are destroyed for a lack of knowledge" candidate for poster child 2024! (media.scored.co)
posted 7 months ago by guywholikesDjtof2024 7 months ago by guywholikesDjtof2024 +61 / -2
31 comments share
31 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (31)
sorted by:
▲ 9 ▼
– Skywise 9 points 7 months ago +9 / -0

Yeah - it's all circular reasoning with these guys. I've argued ad-nauseum about this for years when they were trying to legalize gay marriage.

"Marriage is about procreation and raising a family."

"Nu-huh, whaddabout people that can't have children?! Should we deny them marriage. is that FAIR?!"

"That's based out of traditional cultures and from a time when women couldn't get a job and couldn't survive on their own without a man's income and that's all changed now. it's a marriage of convenience"

"Nu-huh, without marriage you can't get in to see your husband/wife in the hospital or make life decisions for them, nor can you pass on your estate when you die!"

"Again, that's just a matter of tradition and all you need to do is change the laws or setup a contract."

"That's what marriage is, bigot, a CONTRACT."

"Technically that's a civil marriage, not a REAL marriage in the eyes of God."

"So you would just deny love to two people from the same sex!"

"Not at all, live with whom you want - it's just not a 'marriage' if you redefine marriage to be whomever wants to marry whomever then why are you deliberately limiting it to that. Why not redefine it so you can have multiple partners, like polygamy and the mormons do?"

"Now you're being stupid, marriage is between two people only!"

"Why not redefine it to allow marriage to your favorite pet then?"

"No, marriage is between two people of any sex, bigot. I'm not redefining anything, you are! Love is love and we won, bigot!"

And, well... here we are...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– Adamrises 8 points 7 months ago +8 / -0

I'm always in love with when they pull the "homosexual is NATURAL" card.

Because then I remind them that most homosexual acts in nature are stronger men beating weaker men and fucking them to show dominance. Which usually makes them, who are always smaller than my gargantuan self, realize the implications of and ends the conversation.

Or with women, the prevelance of rape in nature in general. So much so that ducks evolved special vaginas for it and dolphins doing it is a sign of their intelligence.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– ernsithe 2 points 7 months ago +2 / -0

"Technically that's a civil marriage, not a REAL marriage in the eyes of God."

It would be so easy to say, "but we're talking about legalization. That only applies to civil marriage. Men do not get to define what real marriage is in the eyes of God anyway."

But taking that point in their favor is unthinkable because anything less than forcing complete equivalence on your is seen as a loss. To take that point, it'd have to be someone actually arguing towards similar legal treatment and just using it as a preface to defile the religious union.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– YesThisIsHe 1 point 7 months ago +1 / -0

"Not at all, live with whom you want - it's just not a 'marriage' if you redefine marriage to be whomever wants to marry whomever then why are you deliberately limiting it to that. Why not redefine it so you can have multiple partners, like polygamy and the mormons do?"

"Now you're being stupid, marriage is between two people only!"

I look forward to the polyarmoury weirdos sincerely arguing this position soon.

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

The below rules are just a summary of the rules which can be found in the Welcome Ashore post.

.

ONE: Do not post Illegal Activity, or criminal manifestos.

.

TWO: Do not engage in speech that promotes, advocates, glorifies, or endorses violence.

.

THREE: Do not threaten, harass, defame, or bully users.

.

FOUR: Do not post involuntary Salacious Material.

.

FIVE: Do not post Porn

.

SIX: NSFW content must be flaired NSFW.

.

SEVEN: Do not post Facebook accounts or twitter accounts with less than 500 followers, and personal information.

.

EIGHT: Do not intentionally deceive others by impersonating another.

.

NINE: Do not solicit or engage in transactions that are federally regulated by the US govt.

.

TEN: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

ELEVEN: Do not post spam.

.

TWELVE: Do not post intentional falsehoods or hoaxes.

.

THIRTEEN: No reposts

.

FOURTEEN: Do not post more than 5 posts a day to this sub.

.

FIFTEEN: Do not direct particularly egregious identity based slurs at users.

.

SIXTEEN: Do not attack entire identity groups as inferior or conspiring.


Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • ClockworkFool
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - wpl9c (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy