"How dare you be mean to me while I am being mean to you. I'm gonna write about this in my private journal that everyone can read, which isn't doxxing because it just isn't okay"
Gosh this is embarrassing. All of my female colleagues @ThevoiceAlexa @DreaHumphrey @SheilaGunnReid have been physically assaulted/roughed up in the field covering events/protests and never once has any "association" called it out
Rachel Gilmore is not a victim of harassment or intimidation by getting into a back-and-forth debate with @CarymaRules in a public place they both happened to be.
In fact Gilmore is experienced in harassing others including helping spread doxxed information about an Indigenous single mother who Far-Left activists were trying to get fired from her job.
This was for merely saying in a private Facebook group that people should respectfully call out the lies Gilmore was spreading about another person (James Topp).
When Gilmore was confronted by the anonymous Twitter account of the person she was doxxing, Gilmore then recirculated the doxxed information saying "you mean this" followed by a weak justification that because the identifying information was found online (on a non-political public Facebook page) then shinning a spotlight on it while Far-Left activists were trying to ruin the person's life was totally ok.
Other journalists beleaguered by harassment are wondering why the Canadian Association of Journalists (CAJ) is malingering over Rachel Gilmore being asked valid questions about her public work, while remaining silent about challenges they have faced.
Consider that Canadian Anti-Hate Network (CAHN) executive director Evan Balgord used to be vice-president of CAJ.
My daring to report on CAHN’s positionality in the hate industry and protest circuit— a contentious topic in the public interest— could be an explanation for Gilmore’s special treatment.
One wonders whether the social media manager considered CAJ ethics guidelines before attempting to incite others against me, specifically the section on Conflicts of Interest.
CAJ is not a regulatory body. I have previously experienced bias from this organization and reject their current intervention as similarly prejudiced.
Actions like this may contribute to people distrusting mainstream media.
Some of you, like me, grew up watching old-school journalists knock on doors, chase down subjects for comment, and refuse to shy away from tough conversations.
I seek to practice journalism in its rawest form—driven by curiosity, integrity, and the relentless pursuit of the truth.
My $0.02:
The anonymous voice of TonyYvce is elevated as a so-called expert on extremism, yet the account itself is operated by an extremist who promotes political violence and engages in criminal harassment.
If journalists responsible for platforming TonyYvce cannot tolerate being asked questions about their national reporting in public, perhaps switch to a less contentious beat or different career.
Feeling discomfort over a question should never be conflated with being physically unsafe.
In any event, journalists are not required to disclose sources except by court order— maybe that is the next step, since asking politely did not yield results.
Just like any journalist, she'd show up to your kids school and interrogate your 5 year old daughter about why her father is a terrorist, and ask "How many times has your dad raped you? Here, look at these pictures of dead kids, and tell me how many times your daddy does this to you?" Yes, she'd do it during school hours. Yes, she's illegally sneak onto the property. Yes, when you arrived she'd call a tow truck to take your car while you are yelling at her for abusing your children. Yes, she would laugh hysterically to her other journalist friends on WhatsApp about how funny it was to make your daughter cry. Yes, she would cry crocodile tears on Tiktok about how you harassed her. Is this harassment, I don't care. I know for a fact she does worse than this to normal people every day of her life.
I don't know anything about this cunt as an individual, but her profession tells me all I need to know. Luckily, she, like all other Leftist Corporate cum dumpsters, is an ideologically captured collectivist. Thus, I know everything about her already. I don't need to know her as an individual, because she isn't one. As such, I know for a fact she earned whatever this is from whomever these people are because of what she does with her life every single day.
She's a corporate journalist. Her life revolves convincing you to send your kids to die for nefarious causes, so that she can sell pictures of your dead kids back to you. Nothing else.
This former globalist news reporter is directly connected to the government backed extremist group known as the Canadian Anti-hate network, and they and Jonathan Yaniv are trying to get Donald Francis Smith to kill himself due to homeless in retaliation for calling them out.
"How dare you be mean to me while I am being mean to you. I'm gonna write about this in my private journal that everyone can read, which isn't doxxing because it just isn't okay"
Why do they make it so fucking easy to hate them.
CAJ tweets: https://nitter.poast.org/caj/status/1862498572668743723
https://x.com/TamaraUgo/status/1862541023882223753
https://x.com/wyatt_claypool/status/1862555845856567414
Rachel Gilmore is not a victim of harassment or intimidation by getting into a back-and-forth debate with @CarymaRules in a public place they both happened to be.
In fact Gilmore is experienced in harassing others including helping spread doxxed information about an Indigenous single mother who Far-Left activists were trying to get fired from her job.
This was for merely saying in a private Facebook group that people should respectfully call out the lies Gilmore was spreading about another person (James Topp).
https://thenationaltelegraph.com/culture-media-coverage/rachel-gilmore-helped-spread-doxxed-information-about-a-pro-freedom-indigenous-woman/
When Gilmore was confronted by the anonymous Twitter account of the person she was doxxing, Gilmore then recirculated the doxxed information saying "you mean this" followed by a weak justification that because the identifying information was found online (on a non-political public Facebook page) then shinning a spotlight on it while Far-Left activists were trying to ruin the person's life was totally ok.
https://x.com/CarymaRules/status/1862534579090817133
Other journalists beleaguered by harassment are wondering why the Canadian Association of Journalists (CAJ) is malingering over Rachel Gilmore being asked valid questions about her public work, while remaining silent about challenges they have faced.
Consider that Canadian Anti-Hate Network (CAHN) executive director Evan Balgord used to be vice-president of CAJ.
My daring to report on CAHN’s positionality in the hate industry and protest circuit— a contentious topic in the public interest— could be an explanation for Gilmore’s special treatment.
One wonders whether the social media manager considered CAJ ethics guidelines before attempting to incite others against me, specifically the section on Conflicts of Interest.
CAJ is not a regulatory body. I have previously experienced bias from this organization and reject their current intervention as similarly prejudiced.
https://x.com/CarymaRules/status/1862528949466599902
Actions like this may contribute to people distrusting mainstream media.
Some of you, like me, grew up watching old-school journalists knock on doors, chase down subjects for comment, and refuse to shy away from tough conversations.
I seek to practice journalism in its rawest form—driven by curiosity, integrity, and the relentless pursuit of the truth.
My $0.02:
The anonymous voice of TonyYvce is elevated as a so-called expert on extremism, yet the account itself is operated by an extremist who promotes political violence and engages in criminal harassment.
If journalists responsible for platforming TonyYvce cannot tolerate being asked questions about their national reporting in public, perhaps switch to a less contentious beat or different career.
Feeling discomfort over a question should never be conflated with being physically unsafe.
In any event, journalists are not required to disclose sources except by court order— maybe that is the next step, since asking politely did not yield results.
When it gets to this point, I say @effwu.
They are used to hitting the Report button on Twitter and get people who oppose them censored and banned.
This is a shock to them when people are allowed to voice their opposition.
I don't give a shit about this.
Just like any journalist, she'd show up to your kids school and interrogate your 5 year old daughter about why her father is a terrorist, and ask "How many times has your dad raped you? Here, look at these pictures of dead kids, and tell me how many times your daddy does this to you?" Yes, she'd do it during school hours. Yes, she's illegally sneak onto the property. Yes, when you arrived she'd call a tow truck to take your car while you are yelling at her for abusing your children. Yes, she would laugh hysterically to her other journalist friends on WhatsApp about how funny it was to make your daughter cry. Yes, she would cry crocodile tears on Tiktok about how you harassed her. Is this harassment, I don't care. I know for a fact she does worse than this to normal people every day of her life.
I don't know anything about this cunt as an individual, but her profession tells me all I need to know. Luckily, she, like all other Leftist Corporate cum dumpsters, is an ideologically captured collectivist. Thus, I know everything about her already. I don't need to know her as an individual, because she isn't one. As such, I know for a fact she earned whatever this is from whomever these people are because of what she does with her life every single day.
She's a corporate journalist. Her life revolves convincing you to send your kids to die for nefarious causes, so that she can sell pictures of your dead kids back to you. Nothing else.
This former globalist news reporter is directly connected to the government backed extremist group known as the Canadian Anti-hate network, and they and Jonathan Yaniv are trying to get Donald Francis Smith to kill himself due to homeless in retaliation for calling them out.