Judicial Watch: Homeland Security Records Confirm Extensive Government Censorship of Conservative Social Media During 2020 Elect...
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it received 274 pages of records from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) revealing an extensive effort by government and non-government entities to monitor and censor social media posts on ...
We've known what this propaganda structure is, but it's good to pull the details out of it. Our first hits of this came from the Twitter files. Project Veritas reported on the Congressional Investigation, and Judicial Watch is finally pulling out the emails.
Just to give you a rundown, it is a massive information laundering operation. DHS, via their sub-department CISA, created the Election Integrity Partnership. This partnership contains Civil Society organizations, Data Analytics firms, Universities, Social Media companies, and news outlets.
This partnership took in complaints from "Civil Society Organizations" (read: George Soros backed progressive organizations) and universities (like Stanford's Internet Observatory). The EIP reports on the complaints and connects the complainants to pay for data analytics companies like Graphika or Universities computer forensics departments, or The Atlantic Council's DFRLabs to generate data analysis on their complaints. The EIP then makes a report on the analysis that they got from their own complaint. Journalists cite the report from the EIP in a smear piece. The EIP then reports on the media citing their own report to claim that these complaints must have legitimacy.
So, to make it simple. The EIP:
Anyways, abolish CISA and put everyone involved in this in a federal prison for the next 20 years.
We already knew this, thanks to the Twitter files.
Anyone who didn’t think this was happening is dangerously naive.
Oh, look it's the guy that thinks Anita Sarkesian founded Hamas.
It's a shame you posted this because you ruin it's credibility by doing so.
"Joined" is not the same as "founded". She was one of the College Idiots for Palestine, and that is the network that she tapped to protect her reputation when people disagreed with her on the internet a decade later.
You are the equivalent of a flat earther for gamergate.
Comment Reported for: Rule 3 - Harassment
Comment Removed for: Rule 3 - Harassment
Hellsbells00, you were ordered not to reply to Cato.
Bitch I do NOT care. The rules are a consistent standard, but arbitrary "you're not allowed to talk when this retard spews bullshit" is not a power you can claim that anyone will respect. You do not have arbitrary powers to ORDER me not to reply to a user. This is a discussion board, not a fucking preschool. Your bullshit defeats the purpose of the board.
Further, you continue to not read the comment chain. That faggot is doing the exact thing I did in reply - referencing other shit a user has said. This isn't a chan, posters have pasts, is bringing up their own opinions against the rules now?
It is incredibly ironic that there are "waaah I'm being harassed silence my opposition" reports from the same conpro brigading cucks that constantly shit up the place and whine about you. It is pathetic of you to actually enable them when you can't be bothered to clean up the fucking board from all the conpro goblin brigading.
I've had to introduce it once or twice and it worked both times to stop generating needless drama on the board. You can talk about other people, just not to this one.
Yeah, no, get fucked. I'm not your peasant. General rules I accept, but you don't own me and if you think you can dictate specifically which users I'm "allowed" to reply to on a discussion forum, you're fucked.
And you didn't address the rest. You didn't target bitchboy despite him doing the same thing to gazerbeam, you're only protecting him because he or his brigade spam your report queue when someone points out HIS OWN STANCES.
If I was profile stalking and replying with generic insults to every post that would make sense as harassment. It is very clearly not that. This is me seeing him starting shit in a thread I opened and pointing out his hypocrisy in the exact same manner. Most of the time I see this retard I don't reply.
"Pointless drama" by arguing with someone who is a lying, scheming propagandist, and a brigader. Because political arguments on a board for that topic are "pointless drama" - only because the same faggot brigade constantly shitting on you and trying to incite riots is blowing up your queue.
I get that you're insinuating I can shit-talk in a non reply, and that's passive-aggressive bitchlike sniping which IS pointless drama - exactly like the whinging bitch thread that faggot made about me that prompted you attempting this, where he was too much of a coward to even use the correct username and get my attention.
I only engage in directly refuting someone's bullshit. And I won't stop doing that when it's called for just because it hurts his fee fees. You only care because it makes work for you. You may as well just kill the board off entirely, you're letting it die a slow death to cancer.