Original link: https://www.realityslaststand.com/p/why-was-this-groundbreaking-study
Archive link: https://archive.is/SlQol
Posted this for future bookmarking, but yea, head slapping no kidding, right?
Of course the NYT covered it up.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (29)
sorted by:
It's true, it was. But it was a different brand of it, focused on fiscal inequality (regardless of your thoughts on the merits of the complaints), which was actually a small bit successful at their "job", right up until they fell, suddenly and mysteriously, into race-and-sex-socialism and collapsed in a purity spiral.
A tiger and a lion may both be giant predatory cats you wouldn't want near your home, but it's still useful to know the distinction between the two as they have very different natures, and a lion suddenly becoming a tiger for some reason is something worth noting. The transformation from fiscal to racial socialism changed the beast entirely.
Sorry for the downvote, but I am SO tired of this narrative. This movement was astroturfed from the start, had no leader (on purpose), and was used to pit the young vs Boomers.
It never gave rise to a woke movement, that was going on well before that.