The new batman villains are ppl who oppose illegal immigrants
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (50)
sorted by:
I call these Rorschach moments, in honor of retarded communist comic book author Alan Moore, whose inverted moral compass made him think that Rorschach would be an insulting caricature of conservatives and not by far the most relatable and honorable character in Watchmen.
It’s a funny thing when leftists try to frame their political and cultural opponents as the loser bad guys in media - because those “far-right reactionary fascist” bad guys always end up being kind of awesome and thoroughly correct.
Like happened with Red Skull in the last decade.
Someone evidently thought "Here's a topic we want to paint as bad, let's pair it with Super Hitler! That'll show them Drumpfchuds!"
Somewhat related since it's DC, Superman had a comic about climate change including Superman's son being in a group with a sign that read "There is no planet B".
Earth literally is "planet B" for Kal'El.
Various DC characters, including Superman, are written as being so beyond mortal intelligence that solving something like climate change should in fact be quite possible for a large number of the DC roster.
The Justice League also not only have the ability to travel to other planets through tech, but many individual members can similarly achieve spaceflight. That alone should mean access to solar resources but of course doesn't.
Because comics always try to be "Earth like" and maintain the status quo of having superheroes in a semi-realistic world that can't actually go around fixing things since that would get in the way of "the message".
Fun fact, we have a solution for "climate change", aka excess CO2: Iron ocean seeding. A billion dollars of rust dumped into specific parts of the ocean would offset a century of CO2 emissions.
That this solution is not thoroughly investigated is proof that it's all bullshit.
They'll always say "It might have side effects that are bad!"
Ok, but you're telling me that all life on Earth will die if we do nothing in the next X years. If you really believed that, then any side effect that's less than total extinction is a win.
The same groups saying iron seeding might have negative effects were demanding Congress dump coal dust on the ice sheets in the 1970s to fight global cooling. And then demanding tougher emissions controls in the 90s to fight global warming.