Trump's Second Term: Foreign Policy
(littoria.substack.com)
Comments (15)
sorted by:
tl;dr cabinet is full of hawks that want to start a bunch of wars and will try to set it up so that White Christians get blamed for them
This speculation is based on Trump's cabinet NOT having jews in it? Also a little ironic that he capitalizes "Jew" but not "white".
Not having Jews while having a ton of turbo butt goys
This all plays out with me theory that the deep state let him win so they can pin the upcoming war with Iran on him. Then push a far left socialist at the savior. They even rigged the house and Senate races as an insurance policy to make sure he can't pass anything.
War with Iran isn't some 4D chess thing. It's just something they want to do and win on behalf of Israel.
Desperate fucking cope. I remain convinced that the purpose of the alt-right is to kill populism at the behest of Socialism, mostly because Socialism is preferrable to them.
Only by the political Left because those are an easy target, and that's the only thing the alt-right cares about: re-iterating and renfocring their position as the Heel in the Intersectionalist Narrative.
"Obviously Zion Don's gonna start wars. To prove that here's the exact reason he was able to get peace."
The problem with the conflict in Gaza is that every one of the MENA states are incentivized for war. A major effort of the Abrham Accords and the "corruption" of these Real Estate deals is to get these countries to invest in tourism which makes war and crime inherently unacceptable. You create a tourist economy for these countries, and the propensity of war collapses.
That's literally the opposite of starting a war. It's building an economy of sustainable peace. This shit is why I argue he actually got so much Muslim and Arab support in the last election. The White Communists are pushing for Pro-Palestinian nonsense as it is an extension of Leftism. The rest of the Arab world knows that there is a way out of the cycle of violence with Trump's middle east agenda. Moreover, these efforts didn't come from the State Department, or his ME liaisons, it came from the Ambassador Corps.
This is nonsense. You're not going to get back the East because it wants to be Russian. You're not going to give up the West because it wants to be NATO. The lines are already drawn hard and nobody has enough men or material to cross those lines.
Don't forget, he already had a border with a NATO country before all of this. It's called Poland. No UN Peacekeeping force needed. Especially when Belorussia exists.
.
Reading this is just a waste. All I see here is whining about people who are prepared to engage in violence, not having an anti-Israel stance.
Do you think the Arab voters who supported Trump and are now lobbying him for ceasefires in Palestine and Lebanon are going to be happy with the results they get out of him?
Are you arguing Jared Kushner is not corrupt? Is selling arms to Saudi Arabia, the infamous backers of Wahabi extremism and home of most of the 9/11 hijackers, good for peace?
What in the fuck does this even mean?
Don't read things, goy. Just trust the plan and stare longingly at Petey's tattoos.
Ceasefires in Palestine will continue the war, just as it always has since 1947. Saudi Arabia is a major player in getting peace, you won't have it without them.
Exactly what it says. Stay withing the Overton Window, play the villain character in the false dichotomy, successfully lose at each turn, poison your own credibility, and use your poisoned credibility as a weapon to delegitimize everyone who is even arguably adjacent to you in any manner.
Get something worth reading.
The Arab voters want them though. You said they wouldn't regret voting for Trump despite now saying they won't get what they want out of doing so. Your vision of """peace""" is Israel annexing Gaza and the West Bank and killing or expelling any Arabs living there who stand in their way.
You keep calling both me and the Left Islamists motivated by anti-Semitism while also saying I'm playing the villain for them. It makes no fucking sense. Which is it?
The Arab voters want peace, the White Left wants "ceasefire", as in: re-armament. "Killing or expelling any Arabs living there who stand in their way" is just your way of saying "Pro-Hamas fighters". Plenty of Arabs exist in Israel.
You're motivated by jew hate, not antisemitism. The Left is a philosophy of war, they'll take whatever position they publicly need to take. Yes, they hate jews, that sect is gaining dominance. Yes, they are going to slander others with jew hate because it's a useful tool for their narrative. Stalin pulled the same shit in the Soviet Union, particularly in regards to Israel.
The Arab voters are lobbying Trump for a ceasefire. It's right there in the link within the article.
Hamas doesn't even govern the West Bank. If you think everyone being expelled is pro-Hamas, then Israel is committing acts of war against us in dumping them in the West. How should we retaliate?
Yes, there are plenty of Arabs who bent the knee and tolerate Israel's ethnic cleansing.
There's a lot in that article that isn't legitimate.
Hamas is a splinter group of a different terrorist group that does control the West Bank. Israel is not committing acts of war by 'dumping them' in the west. They are going to the west because we keep opening the door for them.
There is no "we." Treasonous Israel loyalists operating here lobby and bribe our politicians to accept them alongside the lobbying efforts of Israeli politicians themselves.
Putins own actions also caused new NATO borders to be created due to Finland joining. So if his goal was to rage against NATO he did a poor job of it (much like how people ignore all of those Eastern European nations would have a very good reason to join NATO). A NATO patrolled DMZ would also be just as good at keeping UKRAINE from doing anything just as much as it keeps Russia from doing anything, and now their lack of NATO membership isnt really a big deal. Honestly, Trumps proposed peace deal with probably the best outcome for Ukraine while allowing Russia to save what little face they have left, even if it pisses off both the NAFO types and the Vatniks.
And on a wide note, it is part of why I do actually like Hegseth for SecDef. It was obvious to me from some of the interviews I watched that he understands the true nature of war that a lot of people forgot (or told themselves to forget) because it is brutal and they dont like it: Peace is rarely achieved in war through documents and negotiations. Peace is achieved through crushing your enemies, seeing them driven before you, and hearing the lamentations of their women. And we in the collective West have allowed ourselves to become deluded into believing that we can diplomacy our way out of all things, and is why we have allowed our militaries to become social experiments instead of lethal weapons. Hegseth understands all of that, and is ready and willing to take a hatchet to the entire DOD to turn it into a weapon again, and do it quick because he knows the threat from China is paramount and he has until 2027 to get it done (at least according to Xi's sabre rattling).
Hopefully, he starts with the Navy and the Marines. They would be the two most important in a potential war with China, and while the Air Force would also be important there they have less issues in their warfighting arm compared to the other two.
The wehraboo fags aren't "alt right". That's CNN terminology. Any kind of slander is thrown under that definition, it's like "assault weapon".
They're leftists. Anyone who advocates gay race communism is a leftist. Anyone who tries to screech "ree it's all joos" is attempting to distract from the real nature of globalists and derail actual right wing with idpol shit - you aren't wrong about that part. They may claim to fight the dominant leftist party, but they're still leftists. Don't let them pretend otherwise.