Based. Apparently the potato in a wig was arrested
Somewhat related: neighborhood Karens make up stories about Fuentes. The "your body my choice" line was a real heater.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (92)
sorted by:
It's because you faggots always think "everyone who disagrees with me is a jew", and you've been calling me a jew for... jesus, seven consecutive years?
Point of order: this forum has only existed for 4 or 5 years and I haven't been really aware of the jq stuff for more than 2 years.
The thing is this, I'm not calling you a jew for disagreeing, I'm calling you a jew for attacking a man's reputation WITHOUT disagreeing.
When your knee jerk reaction whenever the forbidden one's name is mentioned is to spout the same tired, astroturfed, reputation attack talking points, I get to point out that might be because you have a self interest in dissuading others from listening to what he has to say.
Seriously Nick's shows and interviews are all public, you can easily dispute his claims and prescriptions with quotes. Use that old facts and logic and verbal iq and all that.
I would bet we agree on 90% of everything except for the most important thing, should Whites or should jews rule in America (and Europe)?
I'm using the collectivist "you". There's a reason I asked for my flair to be "Secret Jewish Subverter" on the KiA2 subreddit when it was first directed at me. As a collectivist, you can accept collective punishment for things you explicitly didn't do; but your ideology did. Just as you would be willing to take credit for shit you didn't do.
I don't need to disagree with a faggot to recognize his character flaws. "Your Body, My Choice" is funny too. He's still a retarded faggot. I don't care that you think I shouldn't disparage him when I agree, but I agree with people I disparage all the time. This is a common occurrence when talking to any and all humans.
Primarily, my problem with him is that he's dedicated to killing the Populist Right by any means necessary, and should be gate-kept out of it as an actual subversive. Kinda like Liz Cheney. I don't need to listen to Liz Cheney's arguments over and over again to see if I can publicly dispute them each time. She had her chance, and she needs to go. Fuentes can go to considering both of their work was cited by Obama to campaign against Trump.
We clearly don't because you don't even have the right premise. Europe isn't ruled. It's not a political body. The US is ruled, but it's a Liberal state. It doesn't fall into racial hierarchies. Then again, neither does Europe. At best, several states within Europe are states where the domestic population would prefer having leaders that represent their ethnicity. But you aren't taking that into consideration because you're worried about race, not ethnicity. You want to know if I think the members of your preferred political construct that you made in your head, regardless of values, should be at the head of all western governments, regardless of the means they got there and what they represent. You also are pretending white jews don't exist, when jews aren't a race.
So, the whole question is flawed, and we really don't agree on shit.