On paper it should be an easy Trump win, but I suspect shenanigans.
This is the perfect place to ask people who are informed. Which agenda will take the win in November and why do you think they will?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (109)
sorted by:
Mm, not all, clearly.
Generally I think it's decent practice for managers to let their employees make mistakes no matter what color their skin. It's how people learn.
Sounds like the company you work for kind of sucks. I haven't had that issue at the major tech companies where I've worked, nor have I seen guys at their major tech companies complain so much on it.
See this just means you are not discussing in good fate. A clearly racist training, specific for "people of color" and you're only take is that it should be for everyone rather then it is racist. You seem delusional to the extreme where you stick your head in sand.
Honest to God, do you not believe white people, white men in particular are being discriminated in tech?
This is exactly how my first job ran, with my team of white males (and one middle eastern male who was an above average performer). We were given a long training regime and then our own projects where we largely looked after ourselves. Each of us made mistakes, as any new employee would. Nobody was ever reprimanded for it, if anything everyone came down and talked about their first time crashing one of the machines or busting the spindle or whatever. It's how people learn.
Yes, I believe that sort of training should be pretty normal. I don't think it's racist unless the training was "only allow black people to make mistakes. If white people make mistakes then punish them."
No, I do not.
The training was literally people of color need room to make mistakes and we need to give them a voice and other crap.
It also had a lot feminist bs and women only training opportunities for management.
I don't think it's at all unreasonable to allow employees to make mistakes (provided they learn from them) and to give them a voice. Unless the training is also telling workers to not afford the same courtesy to white employees, I don't see an issue.
Got another cool story.
A couple of friends of mine worked on a tech company, it was all in on diversity and shit. Imagine your ultimate DIE company where you have black females looking over and giving "advise". It was the typical leftist threw a ton of money at the employees, trips in exotic locations, bonuses etc.
It had a boom during covid and then they realized this company is going down hard, turns out all the DIE hires are entitled brats don't actually produce enough. They ended up ending 90% of their work force. Not even an exaggeration but actually had to let go 90% of their employees.
Turns out what remained is not exactly diverse. Fun stuff.
The 2 friends that worked there, both white, one guy and one girl. In her team he had one guy and I think 2 other women. Funny part was that one of the girls on that team was completely incompetent, she was used to getting guys to do stuff for her, she was above average looking. Turns out that the only guy was gay, and she was not even able to do easy tasks. Very comical overall. All this forced diversities can be entertaining if it does not affect you personally.
Cool story indeed! Sounds like their tech company sucks if they're hiring unqualified supervisors.
How about most tech companies this days hire diversity that leads to crap that almost kills smaller companies.
You keep trying to say this are outliers when they are not and refuse to acknowledge that white people are systematically discriminated against. The companies themselves are advertising DIE practices.
You say literally nothing of substance. If you have an actual conclusion or a reason to change my mind thru actual stuff, other then you don't "feel" it is as bad because you had an opportunity let me know. Other then that I don't care. At this point I just assume you are an emotional driven woman.
Are you referring to something specific? I don't know how to respond to this because it's pretty vague.
You're pulling out these stories that, while indicative of a poorly run company, really only come down to your word. Fact is there's not a whole lot of information that actually supports what you're saying, so forgive me for not taking the anecdotes as super important news.
Yeah, a lot of people like to go and make assumptions about the other person they're commenting with to justify whatever it is they're hearing. Happy to prove you wrong though so you can come correct.