Trust the science
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (42)
sorted by:
i think its the opposite. They lived in warmer places with plentiful amounts of food and never had winters, so they never needed to have long term planning to survive the winters that had no food.
Kinda true actually, can't even use dangerous fauna as an excuse as Europeans just cleansed them than have them be an issue.
Then look at the places Whites colonised in Africa and they turned deserts into gardens and breadbaskets. The Whites were actually on HARD MODE on where they spawned lol.
Lacking winter might help, but many areas just straight up had drought and dry seasons that made food just as difficult to grow. Often times more than just for a winter, which is why agriculture was far less developed if at all.
Its also not just "its hot" level problems, the fauna there is far more dangerous than in most other areas, with a lot more bite and venom to go around. Because even the animals themselves adapted to the harshness of it by becoming more lethal. Which means even the abundance of it isn't nearly as helpful because of how many you'll lose dealing with them.
There is a reason why nearly every "civilized" nation came out of somewhere that had cold/temperate climates, no matter how bad winter is, and most of the tribal slower to civilize ones came out of tropical and desert ones.