Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

86
Whistleblower interview on the US government's explicit and direct funding of child trafficking. (twitter.com)
posted 1 year ago by ApparentlyImAHeretic 1 year ago by ApparentlyImAHeretic +86 / -0
8 comments share
8 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (8)
sorted by:
▲ 4 ▼
– ernsithe 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

So for example...

  1. Identify home country.
  2. Return to home country under care of home country's bureaucracy.

This is actually a horrifically stupid legal bureaucracy involving the laws of at least two nations, and possibly international laws and treaties. There does need to be a process in this case.

Yes, but that process can take place in either jurisdiction once it is established.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Gizortnik 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Yes, their stay in the US is mostly for the lag time that it takes to get them back. Weirdly, this can take 6 months to a year due to judiciary and bureaucratic nonsense.

I remember because MSNBC did a story about "unaccompanied minors being exiled by the Trump administration after separating them from their parents". It was actually about how a mom stole a kid from her husband and fled to the US. She was arrested, the kid was sent to an immigration facility. The family court of the host country was called, and they sorted out the domestic situation. The US government then bought the kid a plane ticket on a specially designated flight that would fly back into the host country where the grand-parents would be waiting to pick the kid up.

MSNBC reported on all of this, assuming their readers are illiterate and would get bored by the 3rd paragraph, and just spent most of the early part of the article reporting how the mother "didn't know where her kid would end up" despite the grandparents being required to pick the kid up from the airport.

Yes, but that process can take place in either jurisdiction once it is established.

Yes, absolutely. The only issue is that immigration cases with children can still be stupid, so you never know if the host country is going to demand the children back, or refuse to take them.

If they don't have any guardians, you basically just need to keep them in child-designated immigration holding facilities. These were the ones where AOC was claiming they were "jails" and that "children drank out of the toilets" because the toilets had a built in sink feature for washing hands. They are a bit spartan, but the staff do keep the kids safe, there are recreational centers, and there's plenty of food. Not the greatest place for boy or girl to hang out, but it's a safe & protective environment. They shouldn't need to be moved around at all once there.

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - w2qgj (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy