Interesting perspective and nice comment from Savvy underneath.
The main problem beyond the ideological that comes with these consultants is that you deprive your in-house talent experience in creating their own stories and become heavily reliant on outsiders to make them.
Its a trap and it's better to make your own stories even if you lack the experience than forever be dependent on the assistance of outsiders.
It definitely is a trap. Those DEI consultants don't suffer the consequences at all. They get paid and are onto the next grift by the time the product goes to market and nobody buys it.
That's a problem with consulting in general too. They get paid to insert themselves in your project with little context, implement exactly what you tell them to, then leave once the contract is up without giving you any documentation. During their contract they will constantly delay because they have other clients they are behind on, so what you are delivered is a rushed mess. When it sucks, they don't care because they got paid and you're too cheap to hire in house, so you'll come crawling back anyway. When you go out of business because the thing you counted on them to build was late and not fit for purpose, they move on to the next sucker
Consultants that are "masters of their craft" when such crafts are an integral part of your media (and you can't be expected to have those sorts of experts on your dev team) is reasonable.
There is no reasonable time for DEI/ESG consultants. And a researcher of ancient Japanese gay pedophilia is not a historian.
Interesting perspective and nice comment from Savvy underneath.
The main problem beyond the ideological that comes with these consultants is that you deprive your in-house talent experience in creating their own stories and become heavily reliant on outsiders to make them.
Its a trap and it's better to make your own stories even if you lack the experience than forever be dependent on the assistance of outsiders.
It definitely is a trap. Those DEI consultants don't suffer the consequences at all. They get paid and are onto the next grift by the time the product goes to market and nobody buys it.
That's a problem with consulting in general too. They get paid to insert themselves in your project with little context, implement exactly what you tell them to, then leave once the contract is up without giving you any documentation. During their contract they will constantly delay because they have other clients they are behind on, so what you are delivered is a rushed mess. When it sucks, they don't care because they got paid and you're too cheap to hire in house, so you'll come crawling back anyway. When you go out of business because the thing you counted on them to build was late and not fit for purpose, they move on to the next sucker
Never hire consultants.
Consultants that are "masters of their craft" when such crafts are an integral part of your media (and you can't be expected to have those sorts of experts on your dev team) is reasonable.
There is no reasonable time for DEI/ESG consultants. And a researcher of ancient Japanese gay pedophilia is not a historian.
I've yet to work with a consultant that was worth the money, and I was one for the early parts of my career